10.2 sec in total
1.9 sec
7.7 sec
556 ms
Click here to check amazing Vigilant Bit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vigilantbit.com
Gather all information about server, page and email server availability in one place. With 30 sec monitoring interval be alerted of problems as-they-happen.
Visit vigilantbit.comWe analyzed Vigilantbit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
vigilantbit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
1896 ms
227 ms
255 ms
261 ms
371 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Vigilantbit.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Vigilantbit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 676.6 kB (39%)
1.7 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Vigilantbit.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 174.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vigilant Bit needs image optimization as it can save up to 174.8 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 286.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 286.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 183.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vigilantbit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 183.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (66%)
58
20
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vigilant Bit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.vigilantbit.com
1896 ms
style.css
227 ms
styles.css
255 ms
cli-style.css
261 ms
font-awesome.css
371 ms
fancybox.css
267 ms
flexslider.css
332 ms
animate.css
675 ms
queries.css
484 ms
jquery.js
865 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
541 ms
jquery.external.lib.js
583 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
620 ms
cookielawinfo.js
719 ms
jquery.backstretch.js
780 ms
jquery.isotope.js
920 ms
jquery.custom.js
1024 ms
wp_eStore_style.css
944 ms
wp_eStore_custom_style.css
1018 ms
eStore_read_form.js
971 ms
jquery.form.min.js
988 ms
scripts.js
1060 ms
jquery.gmap.js
1079 ms
jquery.easing.js
1157 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1270 ms
jquery.hbstreams.js
1192 ms
jquery.supersubs.js
1215 ms
jquery.superfish.js
1286 ms
jquery.validate.js
1470 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
1381 ms
jquery.tweet.js
1442 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1440 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
1498 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1517 ms
selectivizr.js
1708 ms
style.css
1887 ms
css
26 ms
css
36 ms
css
49 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
278 ms
Vigilant-Bit-logo-horizontal-300x53.png
159 ms
VIGILANTBITdotCOM-1024x734.png
974 ms
download_icon.png
185 ms
download-server-monitor.png
221 ms
VB-Monitor-app2.png
565 ms
http_smtp_pop3_ping-monitoring1.png
716 ms
Vigilant-Bit-Monitor-Address-book-Contacts.png
793 ms
VB-Monitor-app_pages.png
451 ms
Vigilant-Bit-Monitor-folders.png
782 ms
Vigilant-Bit-Monitor-folders1.png
1036 ms
6.png
779 ms
twitter-icon.png
938 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
trans-07.png
910 ms
WhiteBackground2-300x267.png
1062 ms
overlay.png
939 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1314 ms
Q-gJrFokeE7JydPpxASt2w9wu1CdFtjuMIsaFqyYbWg.woff
37 ms
Entypo-webfont.woff
1204 ms
collect
36 ms
collect
59 ms
vigilantbit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
vigilantbit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vigilantbit.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vigilantbit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vigilantbit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vigilantbit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vigilant Bit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: