6 sec in total
874 ms
4.7 sec
403 ms
Click here to check amazing Village Resort content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about villageresort.in
Estuarine Village Resort Bhitarkanika. Best hotel in Bhitarkanika. Stay at this riverside resort. Watch salt water crocodiles & varieties of kingfisher
Visit villageresort.inWe analyzed Villageresort.in page load time and found that the first response time was 874 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
villageresort.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value18.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.9 s
1/100
10%
Value2,140 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.735
6/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
874 ms
1031 ms
166 ms
157 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Villageresort.in, 5% (4 requests) were made to Tripadvisor.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Static.tacdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Villageresort.in.
Page size can be reduced by 516.6 kB (14%)
3.7 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Villageresort.in main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.3 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Village Resort images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 363.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Villageresort.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (48%)
75
39
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Village Resort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
villageresort.in
874 ms
www.villageresort.in
1031 ms
style.css
166 ms
responsive.css
157 ms
style.css
112 ms
style.css
175 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
157 ms
styles.css
114 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
jquery.js
347 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
223 ms
script.js
261 ms
jquery_012.js
276 ms
jquery.js
282 ms
jquery.min.js
284 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
342 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
391 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
395 ms
stylesheet.css
402 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
404 ms
css
26 ms
genericons.css
520 ms
style.css
455 ms
jquery.js
558 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
509 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
514 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
517 ms
script.js
602 ms
wowslider.js
615 ms
script.js
647 ms
comment-reply.min.js
676 ms
functions.js
1753 ms
wejs
84 ms
wejs
225 ms
css
15 ms
css
14 ms
logo.png
108 ms
tip_adv_icon.jpg
108 ms
phone_icon.png
126 ms
fb.png
155 ms
tw.png
223 ms
yt.png
237 ms
pic01.jpg
535 ms
pic02.jpg
504 ms
pic03.jpg
614 ms
pic04.jpg
669 ms
banner_shadow.png
349 ms
king-fisher.png
461 ms
pic01.jpg
631 ms
pic02.jpg
794 ms
pic03.jpg
783 ms
pic4.jpg
862 ms
pic11.jpg
807 ms
pic2.jpg
812 ms
pic3.jpg
1163 ms
pic5.jpg
2119 ms
img01.png
908 ms
deer.png
913 ms
footer_logo.jpg
975 ms
medium-logo-12097-2.png
64 ms
myriadpro-regular_3.woff
2031 ms
search_icon.png
1001 ms
nav_separate.jpg
2064 ms
banner_form_bg.png
1871 ms
bellgothicstd-bold.woff
1960 ms
page_top_bg.jpg
1144 ms
sm_box_bg.png
1244 ms
hover_link_bg.png
1342 ms
WidgetEmbed-cdswritereviewlg
18 ms
arrows.png
1782 ms
pause.png
2011 ms
lettergothicstd.woff
2097 ms
cdswidWRL-v2317571853a.css%20%27%29%3B
1 ms
cdswidgets_m-c-v2102084671a.js
133 ms
cdswidWRL-v2317571853a.css
161 ms
WidgetEmbed-cdswritereviewlg
17 ms
grass_pic.png
1849 ms
up.png
627 ms
downArrow.png
1004 ms
fancybox_sprite.png
1034 ms
medium-logo-12097-2.png
29 ms
ratings-v3.png
31 ms
yellow-button.png
30 ms
villageresort.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
villageresort.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
villageresort.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Villageresort.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Villageresort.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
villageresort.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Village Resort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: