3.7 sec in total
127 ms
3 sec
571 ms
Click here to check amazing Vip Remote Health content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vipremotehealth.com
Looking for the best Remote Patient Monitoring System Companies in the USA? We Provide the Most Desirable Health Solutions & Services for Your Patients with Smart Health Band. Get a quote!
Visit vipremotehealth.comWe analyzed Vipremotehealth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
vipremotehealth.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.922
3/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
127 ms
93 ms
103 ms
105 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Vipremotehealth.com, 14% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Vipremotehealth.com.
Page size can be reduced by 155.7 kB (7%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Vipremotehealth.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vip Remote Health images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vipremotehealth.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (75%)
105
26
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vip Remote Health. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.vipremotehealth.com
127 ms
style.min.css
93 ms
front_end_style.css
103 ms
dashicons.min.css
105 ms
desktop_style.css
99 ms
styles.css
100 ms
select2.min.css
106 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
174 ms
style.css
172 ms
plugins.min.css
176 ms
modules.min.css
195 ms
font-awesome.min.css
188 ms
style.min.css
185 ms
ionicons.min.css
254 ms
style.css
263 ms
simple-line-icons.css
262 ms
dripicons.css
267 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
269 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
282 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
337 ms
style_dynamic.css
364 ms
js_composer.min.css
347 ms
css
49 ms
jquery.min.js
373 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
383 ms
scrolltoplugin.min.js
387 ms
js
77 ms
rbtools.min.js
519 ms
rs6.min.js
516 ms
email-decode.min.js
384 ms
css
58 ms
animate.min.css
515 ms
rs6.css
460 ms
index.js
459 ms
index.js
460 ms
rbtools.min.js
560 ms
rs6.min.js
560 ms
like.min.js
596 ms
core.min.js
661 ms
js
90 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
75 ms
tabs.min.js
657 ms
accordion.min.js
572 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
747 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
598 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
598 ms
mouse.min.js
650 ms
slider.min.js
650 ms
jquery.appear.js
586 ms
modernizr.js
620 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
615 ms
jquery.plugin.js
706 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
701 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
672 ms
parallax.min.js
634 ms
easypiechart.js
626 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
665 ms
Chart.min.js
664 ms
counter.js
685 ms
fluidvids.min.js
648 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
618 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
569 ms
TweenLite.min.js
607 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
622 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
617 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
664 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
558 ms
particles.min.js
551 ms
skrollr.js
535 ms
bootstrapCarousel.js
574 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
568 ms
absoluteCounter.min.js
556 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
157 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
213 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
249 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
293 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
295 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
295 ms
jquery.draggable.min.js
557 ms
jquery.touchpunch.min.js
538 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
544 ms
smoothPageScroll.js
509 ms
modules.min.js
718 ms
comment-reply.min.js
706 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
151 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
151 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
154 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
154 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
154 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
154 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
153 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
150 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
154 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
519 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
540 ms
elfsight-cookie-consent.js
625 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
879 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
548 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
550 ms
sidearea.png
732 ms
vip-remote-health-logo-new.png
690 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
33 ms
vip-remote-health-logo-new-retina.png
664 ms
dummy.png
637 ms
callus-2.png
666 ms
smart-watch.png
692 ms
TMB-2084-A-VIP-BP.png
698 ms
availabe_apple_store.png
732 ms
get-it-onplaystore.png
743 ms
2App-5.png
625 ms
2App-16.png
763 ms
doctor-paitent.jpg
780 ms
care-giver-solutions.jpg
771 ms
ai-robotic-care-and-support.jpg
871 ms
get-it-onplaystore.png
732 ms
phone-icon.png
800 ms
disply-icon.png
837 ms
envelope-icon.png
853 ms
Smart-Health-Band-W100-BG-1.jpg
851 ms
smart-health-app.jpg
857 ms
fullwidth-slider-extend.png
893 ms
app-backgroud-1.jpg
881 ms
vip-remote-health-customer-support.jpg
1045 ms
parallax-1-home-main.png
918 ms
main.js
8 ms
vipremotehealth.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vipremotehealth.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vipremotehealth.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vipremotehealth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vipremotehealth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vipremotehealth.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vip Remote Health. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: