Tools & Wizards About Us
virgine.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

virgine.com

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

148 ms

virgine.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Virgine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about virgine.com

Visit virgine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Virgine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

virgine.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

virgine.com

75 ms

virgine.htm

1139 ms

dotstyle.css

204 ms

analytics.js

12 ms

007-hi-y1.htm

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Virgine.com, 64% (7 requests) were made to Dotist.com and 18% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Dotist.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.4 kB (58%)

Content Size

64.8 kB

After Optimization

27.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Virgine.com main page is 64.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 33 B

  • Original 148 B
  • After minification 148 B
  • After compression 115 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33 B or 22% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Virgine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Virgine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Virgine. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

virgine.com

virgine.com

75 ms

virgine.htm

virgine.htm

1139 ms

dotstyle.css

dotstyle.css

204 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

12 ms

007-hi-y1.htm

007-hi-y1.htm

219 ms

up2-e.jpg

up2-e.jpg

716 ms

1bg.gif

1bg.gif

709 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

dotstyle-y.css

dotstyle-y.css

407 ms

image-3232423-10376739

image-3232423-10376739

5 ms

bh.gif

bh.gif

719 ms

Best Practices

virgine.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

virgine.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Virgine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Virgine.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

virgine.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Virgine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: