Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

visitnorfolk.co.uk

Visit Norfolk | Welcome to Norfolk

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

289 ms

visitnorfolk.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit visitnorfolk.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Visit Norfolk content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about visitnorfolk.co.uk

Norfolk's official visitor guide - Norfolk is a great holiday or short break destination at any time of the year. You’ll discover places to stay, destinations, activities and much more.

Visit visitnorfolk.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Visitnorfolk.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visitnorfolk.co.uk performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,950 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.28

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visitnorfolk.co.uk

272 ms

www.visitnorfolk.co.uk

2987 ms

campaignimage.css

291 ms

thickbox.css

294 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Visitnorfolk.co.uk, 8% (6 requests) were made to Thedms.co.uk and 5% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Visitnorfolk.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 384.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Visitnorfolk.co.uk main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.5 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 142.3 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visit Norfolk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 85.0 kB

  • Original 246.0 kB
  • After minification 237.0 kB
  • After compression 161.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.0 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 113.8 kB

  • Original 139.8 kB
  • After minification 117.8 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visitnorfolk.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (49%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visit Norfolk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

visitnorfolk.co.uk accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

visitnorfolk.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

visitnorfolk.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visitnorfolk.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visitnorfolk.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visit Norfolk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: