3.8 sec in total
151 ms
3.3 sec
383 ms
Visit visualtracespec.com now to see the best up-to-date Visualtracespec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about visualtracespec.com
Discover DocSheets AI, the ultimate tool for Enterprise Lifecycle and Project Requirements Management. Combining the simplicity of a spreadsheet with the power of AI, DocSheets AI offers a comprehensi...
Visit visualtracespec.comWe analyzed Visualtracespec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
visualtracespec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value16.9 s
0/100
25%
Value18.0 s
0/100
10%
Value5,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
151 ms
15 ms
28 ms
27 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Visualtracespec.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (336 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 78.7 kB (22%)
349.8 kB
271.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Visualtracespec.com main page is 349.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 207.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visualtracespec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 261 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (92%)
71
6
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visualtracespec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.docsheets.com
151 ms
icons.css
15 ms
global.css
28 ms
styles.css
27 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
35 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
34 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
39 ms
swiper.min.css
38 ms
post-5.css
39 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
37 ms
all.min.css
45 ms
v4-shims.min.css
44 ms
post-6294.css
49 ms
frontend.css
60 ms
theplus.min.css
54 ms
dflip.min.css
64 ms
ekiticons.css
69 ms
default.css
66 ms
font-awesome.min.css
66 ms
widget-styles.css
78 ms
responsive.css
74 ms
general.min.css
75 ms
style-static.min.css
100 ms
jquery.min.js
99 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
76 ms
v4-shims.min.js
96 ms
css
48 ms
counter.js
40 ms
animations.min.css
93 ms
index.js
94 ms
index.js
95 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
96 ms
waypoints.min.js
96 ms
frontend.js
97 ms
core.min.js
184 ms
mouse.min.js
185 ms
slider.min.js
186 ms
theplus.min.js
201 ms
scripts.min.js
217 ms
dflip.min.js
209 ms
frontend-script.js
166 ms
widget-scripts.js
196 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
159 ms
comment-reply.min.js
187 ms
jquery.mobile.js
186 ms
magnific-popup.js
212 ms
easypiechart.js
213 ms
salvattore.js
209 ms
common.js
204 ms
themo-foot.js
204 ms
general.min.js
198 ms
motion-effects.js
190 ms
sticky-elements.js
190 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
187 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
185 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
179 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
179 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
178 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
179 ms
hooks.min.js
179 ms
i18n.min.js
160 ms
frontend.min.js
159 ms
frontend.min.js
160 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
159 ms
animate-circle.min.js
159 ms
elementor.js
160 ms
lazyload.min.js
159 ms
logo-main.png
73 ms
V9-scaled.jpg
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
331 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
333 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
335 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
336 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
336 ms
t.php
326 ms
elementskit.woff
194 ms
travelpack.svg
151 ms
travelpack.woff
140 ms
linea-basic-elaboration-10.woff
148 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
153 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
151 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
153 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
182 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
183 ms
modules.woff
150 ms
recorder.js
58 ms
visualtracespec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
visualtracespec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
visualtracespec.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visualtracespec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visualtracespec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
visualtracespec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Visualtracespec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: