Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

viva.co.nz

Viva - The latest in Lifestyle, Fashion, Culture by Viva - NZ Herald

Page Load Speed

11.9 sec in total

First Response

607 ms

Resources Loaded

10.5 sec

Page Rendered

786 ms

viva.co.nz screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Viva content for New Zealand. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about viva.co.nz

Your ultimate guide to lifestyle, fashion, and culture, curated by Viva.

Visit viva.co.nz

Key Findings

We analyzed Viva.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 607 ms and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

viva.co.nz performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.45

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

viva.co.nz

607 ms

www.viva.co.nz

1346 ms

min.286509ec9689.css

1186 ms

BrightcoveExperiences.js

10 ms

min.de1146f460f3.js

988 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Viva.co.nz, 56% (65 requests) were made to Mediacdn.grabone.co.nz and 3% (3 requests) were made to Bcp.crwdcntrl.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.9 sec) relates to the external source Mediacdn.grabone.co.nz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 800.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Viva.co.nz main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 896.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 81.8 kB

  • Original 102.6 kB
  • After minification 90.7 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 74.6 kB

  • Original 896.5 kB
  • After minification 821.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 416.4 kB

  • Original 557.6 kB
  • After minification 557.5 kB
  • After compression 141.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 416.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 228.1 kB

  • Original 278.2 kB
  • After minification 270.0 kB
  • After compression 50.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viva.co.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 228.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (23%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

83

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

viva.co.nz accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

viva.co.nz best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

viva.co.nz SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viva.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Viva.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Viva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: