2.7 sec in total
357 ms
2.1 sec
312 ms
Welcome to viva64.com homepage info - get ready to check Viva 64 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about viva64.com
A static analyzer for C, C++, C#, and Java code. Works on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Analyzes code for 32-bit, 64-bit, and ARM embedded platforms.
Visit viva64.comWe analyzed Viva64.com page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
viva64.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,490 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
357 ms
625 ms
96 ms
190 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Viva64.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Viva64.com.
Page size can be reduced by 212.9 kB (28%)
749.7 kB
536.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Viva64.com main page is 749.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 472.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viva 64 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.7 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viva64.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (65%)
62
22
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viva 64. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
viva64.com
357 ms
www.viva64.com
625 ms
css3.css
96 ms
up.css
190 ms
fotorama.css
192 ms
template.css
195 ms
jquery.js
287 ms
jquery.cookie.js
205 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
205 ms
countUp.min.js
276 ms
orphus.js
278 ms
fotorama.js
369 ms
widgets.js
6 ms
run_prettify.js
302 ms
template.js
302 ms
image1.png
499 ms
ibm.png
501 ms
vispiron.png
400 ms
teradyne.png
399 ms
awrcorp.png
398 ms
merge.png
500 ms
csir.png
502 ms
roxar.png
500 ms
gedis.png
503 ms
wargaming.png
551 ms
neople.png
572 ms
bottom_unicorn.png
572 ms
orphus.png
583 ms
ga.js
30 ms
bg.png
396 ms
email.png
397 ms
ru.png
449 ms
en.png
471 ms
dot.png
471 ms
button_green.png
483 ms
download.png
491 ms
button_black.png
491 ms
buy.png
553 ms
sidebar_title.png
564 ms
el-readmore.png
574 ms
arrow.png
878 ms
home.png
631 ms
bg_footer.png
630 ms
customers_bg.png
680 ms
prev.png
677 ms
next.png
677 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
search_bg.png
630 ms
search.png
628 ms
collect
72 ms
ga-audiences
66 ms
prettify.css
71 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
28 ms
prev_dis.png
474 ms
syndication
93 ms
357393989256769536
195 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
3 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
7 ms
________4__1_normal.png
119 ms
Cb-Ab_HW8AA4KLh.jpg:small
116 ms
CbegIlKUsAA-lHt.png:small
116 ms
Cbbz05nW8AAbH8C.png:small
113 ms
CbF8GVdW0AAQEzM.png:small
116 ms
CbAPcNAUYAAsdYU.png:small
119 ms
Ca2x7JzXEAAwoth.jpg:small
112 ms
jot
28 ms
viva64.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
viva64.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
viva64.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viva64.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Viva64.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
viva64.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Viva 64. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: