Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

vivaturf.com

VIVATURF | Leading solution provider of artificial yarn and turf| Artificial Grass| Synthetic Turf

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

344 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

vivaturf.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing VIVATURF content for Kazakhstan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivaturf.com

Vivaturf is a leading solution provider specializes in R&D, manufacturing, sales and after-sales service for sports and landscaping artificial turf and related products.

Visit vivaturf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivaturf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivaturf.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vivaturf.com

344 ms

comm.css

119 ms

banner.css

129 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

316 ms

comm.js

132 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Vivaturf.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (912 ms) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 292.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Vivaturf.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 144.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VIVATURF images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 117.5 kB

  • Original 199.5 kB
  • After minification 187.8 kB
  • After compression 82.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 13.8 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivaturf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (18%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VIVATURF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vivaturf.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

[role] values are not valid

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vivaturf.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vivaturf.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivaturf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vivaturf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VIVATURF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: