Tools & Wizards About Us
vod-anbietervergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

vod-anbietervergleich.de

Video on Demand-Anbieter und Online Videotheken im Vergleich und Test

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

694 ms

Page Rendered

278 ms

vod-anbietervergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vod Anbieter Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vod-anbietervergleich.de

Filme, Serien und Kino-Highlights per Stream oder Download auf TV, PC und Tablet. Alle Video On Demand-Anbieter und Online Videotheken im Vergleich und Test.

Visit vod-anbietervergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Vod-anbietervergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 972 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vod-anbietervergleich.de performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.vod-anbietervergleich.de

165 ms

cli-style.css

53 ms

style.css

98 ms

responsive.css

57 ms

style.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Vod-anbietervergleich.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (165 ms) belongs to the original domain Vod-anbietervergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.2 kB (30%)

Content Size

115.4 kB

After Optimization

81.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vod-anbietervergleich.de main page is 115.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 74.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 74.2 kB
  • After minification 63.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vod Anbieter Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 14.5 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vod-anbietervergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vod Anbieter Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.vod-anbietervergleich.de

www.vod-anbietervergleich.de

165 ms

cli-style.css

cli-style.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

98 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

58 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

104 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

59 ms

cookielawinfo.js

cookielawinfo.js

110 ms

responsive-modernizr.min.js

responsive-modernizr.min.js

124 ms

responsive-scripts.min.js

responsive-scripts.min.js

105 ms

jquery.placeholder.min.js

jquery.placeholder.min.js

107 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

148 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

vod-patter.png

vod-patter.png

76 ms

cropped-logo-vod1.png

cropped-logo-vod1.png

57 ms

video-on-demand-auf-fernseher-laptop-tablet-smartphone.jpg

video-on-demand-auf-fernseher-laptop-tablet-smartphone.jpg

50 ms

lovefilm-logo-120x49.jpg

lovefilm-logo-120x49.jpg

64 ms

videoload-logo-120x23.jpg

videoload-logo-120x23.jpg

56 ms

maxdome-logo-120x60.jpg

maxdome-logo-120x60.jpg

52 ms

itunes-logo-120x38.jpg

itunes-logo-120x38.jpg

99 ms

video-buster-logo-120x56.jpg

video-buster-logo-120x56.jpg

106 ms

verfuegbar.png

verfuegbar.png

103 ms

nicht-verfuegbar.png

nicht-verfuegbar.png

106 ms

button-zum-anbieter.png

button-zum-anbieter.png

113 ms

video-on-demand-anbieter-testsieger.gif

video-on-demand-anbieter-testsieger.gif

142 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

151 ms

Accessibility Review

vod-anbietervergleich.de accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vod-anbietervergleich.de best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

vod-anbietervergleich.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vod-anbietervergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vod-anbietervergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vod-anbietervergleich.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vod Anbieter Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: