3.4 sec in total
12 ms
1.7 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to dixoqag.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Dixoqag Word Press best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about dixoqag.wordpress.com
A great WordPress.com site
Visit dixoqag.wordpress.comWe analyzed Dixoqag.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
dixoqag.wordpress.com performance score
12 ms
274 ms
101 ms
119 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Dixoqag.wordpress.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (613 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 806.5 kB (53%)
1.5 MB
725.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Dixoqag.wordpress.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 710.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dixoqag Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 508.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 508.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dixoqag.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (52%)
44
21
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dixoqag Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dixoqag.wordpress.com
12 ms
dixoqag.wordpress.com
274 ms
101 ms
css
119 ms
style.css
97 ms
113 ms
111 ms
style.css
94 ms
gprofiles.js
235 ms
wpgroho.js
105 ms
103 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
111 ms
tiled-gallery.css
103 ms
106 ms
widgets.js
232 ms
104 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
137 ms
w.js
136 ms
merriweather.css
50 ms
Q1387GgnvTs
443 ms
7399771998_6f693e425f_z.jpg
397 ms
tKwLwk-UxVs
544 ms
7413370642_349105b66a_z.jpg
395 ms
Fw2F_dzPF50
613 ms
3c_Orv-CKVk
612 ms
pZnRFjejQzw
610 ms
7411577838_889908cba5_z.jpg
435 ms
k1tBLEZhos4
607 ms
-AuGVhitxTY
607 ms
7392503810_1f056fd19c_z.jpg
424 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
385 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
471 ms
Noticons.svg
169 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
2 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
168 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
260 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
220 ms
px.gif
229 ms
292 ms
hovercard.css
175 ms
services.css
217 ms
px.gif
154 ms
g.gif
221 ms
g.gif
217 ms
g.gif
218 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
183 ms
www-embed-player.js
211 ms
base.js
251 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
162 ms
ad_status.js
292 ms
link
274 ms
track.php
328 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
21 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
67 ms
dixoqag.wordpress.com SEO score
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dixoqag.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Dixoqag.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dixoqag.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dixoqag Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: