3.1 sec in total
39 ms
1.7 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Gyparal Word Press content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gyparal.wordpress.com
A fine WordPress.com site
Visit gyparal.wordpress.comWe analyzed Gyparal.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gyparal.wordpress.com performance score
39 ms
298 ms
61 ms
119 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gyparal.wordpress.com, 15% (8 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 764.0 kB (47%)
1.6 MB
863.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Gyparal.wordpress.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 705.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gyparal Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 506.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 506.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 215.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gyparal.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)
42
18
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gyparal Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gyparal.wordpress.com
39 ms
gyparal.wordpress.com
298 ms
61 ms
119 ms
style.css
41 ms
gprofiles.js
340 ms
wpgroho.js
103 ms
103 ms
238 ms
tiled-gallery.css
157 ms
259 ms
widgets.js
259 ms
161 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
321 ms
w.js
258 ms
merriweather.css
142 ms
reddle-texture.png
60 ms
9leZGgxs3Kk
391 ms
7561094700_b2ce2b8784_z.jpg
395 ms
zUziyuvOrZs
465 ms
7392503810_1f056fd19c_z.jpg
414 ms
E-0rIsZTeos
639 ms
7486261784_1ec69064fb_z.jpg
303 ms
In64PJzOknM
467 ms
yHLGWW0I_kU
607 ms
exTlRUd-0fs
619 ms
KExDMLIPZks
645 ms
7413370642_349105b66a_z.jpg
377 ms
7411577838_889908cba5_z.jpg
368 ms
Noticons.svg
156 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
106 ms
merriweather-bolditalic-webfont.ttf
158 ms
merriweather-italic-webfont.ttf
159 ms
merriweather-lightitalic-webfont.ttf
238 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
236 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
201 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
232 ms
px.gif
288 ms
271 ms
hovercard.css
180 ms
services.css
221 ms
px.gif
213 ms
g.gif
211 ms
g.gif
188 ms
g.gif
189 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
120 ms
www-embed-player.js
147 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
166 ms
ad_status.js
161 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
306 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
307 ms
link
303 ms
track.php
437 ms
gyparal.wordpress.com SEO score
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gyparal.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gyparal.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gyparal.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gyparal Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: