4.2 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.9 sec
336 ms
Welcome to rbm.who.int homepage info - get ready to check Rbm Who best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about rbm.who.int
Visit rbm.who.intWe analyzed Rbm.who.int page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rbm.who.int performance score
1056 ms
522 ms
8 ms
29 ms
150 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rbm.who.int, 69% (36 requests) were made to Rollbackmalaria.org and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rbm.who.int.
Page size can be reduced by 302.7 kB (10%)
3.1 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Rbm.who.int main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rbm Who images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rbm.who.int needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (12%)
41
36
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rbm Who. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rbm.who.int
1056 ms
www.rollbackmalaria.org
522 ms
bootstrap.min.css
8 ms
css
29 ms
frontend.css
150 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
bootstrap.min.js
4 ms
stupidtable.min.js
227 ms
main.js
227 ms
analytics.js
132 ms
logo_arrows_header.png
94 ms
social_media_24_facebook.png
96 ms
social_media_24_twitter.png
95 ms
social_media_24_linkedin.png
149 ms
social_media_24_youtube.png
153 ms
social_media_24_flickr.png
154 ms
search.png
153 ms
RBM_logo_header.png
153 ms
English_Strapline.png
154 ms
nominations_new_slider.png
818 ms
New_era_new_slider.png
599 ms
RBM_new_slider.png
836 ms
banner_arrow_left.png
227 ms
banner_arrow_right.png
226 ms
rbm_app_download_part1.jpg
381 ms
rbm_app_download_part2.jpg
376 ms
rbm_app_download_part3.jpg
301 ms
sidebar_arrows.png
377 ms
social_media_46_facebook.png
452 ms
social_media_46_twitter.png
452 ms
social_media_46_linkedin.png
456 ms
social_media_46_youtube.png
527 ms
social_media_46_flickr.png
528 ms
global_goals_edited.jpg
532 ms
global-action-plans.jpg
826 ms
ProgressandImpact.jpg
1056 ms
in_the_news_image.png
683 ms
world_malaria_day_image.png
670 ms
roadmaps_image.png
745 ms
multisectoral_image.png
759 ms
Join_rbm_image.png
820 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
79 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
79 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
22 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
22 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
22 ms
bebasneue_regular-webfont.woff
768 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
17 ms
linkid.js
34 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
77 ms
rbm.who.int SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbm.who.int can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rbm.who.int main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rbm.who.int
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rbm Who. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: