12.5 sec in total
2.1 sec
10.1 sec
208 ms
Welcome to rti.what-if.com homepage info - get ready to check Rti What If best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rti.what-if.com
From supplying ready to use components from the leading manufacturers to providing complete design and build services, RTI-EOAT has rapidly grown to be one of the world’s end-of-arm tooling leaders fo...
Visit rti.what-if.comWe analyzed Rti.what-if.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
rti.what-if.com performance score
2137 ms
193 ms
163 ms
122 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rti.what-if.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Webtraxs.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) relates to the external source Robo-tool.com.
Page size can be reduced by 471.0 kB (39%)
1.2 MB
749.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rti.what-if.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 774.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 150.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rti What If needs image optimization as it can save up to 114.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 80.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rti.what-if.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (67%)
69
23
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rti What If. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.robo-tool.com
2137 ms
style.css
193 ms
style.css
163 ms
colorbox.css
122 ms
se-styles.css
76 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
154 ms
woocommerce.css
632 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
modernizr.custom.12892.js
132 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
518 ms
jquery-colorbox-wrapper-min.js
449 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
119 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
133 ms
woocommerce.min.js
130 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
152 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
164 ms
ifi-core.js
175 ms
wp-gallery-custom-links.js
193 ms
flexslider.css
196 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
661 ms
bkgd-tile.png
58 ms
rti-header2.png
2018 ms
id.png
547 ms
rss.png
59 ms
bevel-matte.png
56 ms
search-btn.png
98 ms
btn-blank.gif
98 ms
RTI-Front-Slides-LCP2.jpg
1523 ms
RTI-Front-1.jpg
2154 ms
RTI-Front-Slides-SensorCup1.jpg
1841 ms
RTI-front-2.jpg
2461 ms
bullet-li.png
1204 ms
QCS-100T-150x113.jpg
1661 ms
framing-150x113.jpg
1590 ms
MCHA-20-S-150x113.jpg
1890 ms
LC18-NR-150x113.jpg
1728 ms
MCGJ-12-12-15-150x113.jpg
1766 ms
N20AJ-150x113.jpg
1802 ms
MCRB-25R-FR-150x113.jpg
1840 ms
RCE1-150x113.jpg
1919 ms
cups-150x113.jpg
1874 ms
bullet-up.png
2535 ms
page.png
1921 ms
ftr-bkgd2.jpg
1952 ms
prefixfree.min.js
1983 ms
response.min.js
2162 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.min.js
2349 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
2035 ms
jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.7.min.js
2068 ms
jquery.dcmegamenu.1.3.3.min.js
2376 ms
trxscript.php
25 ms
admin-ajax.php
4280 ms
overlay.png
2111 ms
webtraxs.php
55 ms
prefixfree.min.js
268 ms
style.css
130 ms
style.css
220 ms
colorbox.css
154 ms
se-styles.css
162 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
540 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
560 ms
woocommerce.css
609 ms
flexslider.css
253 ms
response.min.js
711 ms
style.css
159 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.min.js
66 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
35 ms
jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.7.min.js
36 ms
jquery.dcmegamenu.1.3.3.min.js
35 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
35 ms
rti.what-if.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rti.what-if.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rti.what-if.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rti.what-if.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rti What If. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: