6.4 sec in total
756 ms
5.3 sec
369 ms
Visit ru.whoisbucket.com now to see the best up-to-date Ru Whoisbucket content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ru.whoisbucket.com
. Quick summary. Last update in Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:59:01 +0100.
Visit ru.whoisbucket.comWe analyzed Ru.whoisbucket.com page load time and found that the first response time was 756 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ru.whoisbucket.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value390 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value6.3 s
60/100
10%
756 ms
109 ms
615 ms
604 ms
644 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Ru.whoisbucket.com, 30% (27 requests) were made to Google.com and 12% (11 requests) were made to Whoisbucket.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 961.9 kB (68%)
1.4 MB
454.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ru.whoisbucket.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 901.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ru Whoisbucket needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 577.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 577.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 229.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ru.whoisbucket.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (78%)
82
18
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ru Whoisbucket. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ru.whoisbucket.com
756 ms
font-awesome.min.css
109 ms
bootstrap.min.css
615 ms
uniform.default.css
604 ms
style-conquer.css
644 ms
style.css
649 ms
style-responsive.css
212 ms
plugins.css
660 ms
light.css
301 ms
custom.css
393 ms
jqvmap.css
482 ms
menu-toggler.png
699 ms
flags.css
781 ms
jsapi
55 ms
show_ads.js
29 ms
addthis_widget.js
40 ms
graph
51 ms
graph
51 ms
graph
56 ms
graph
52 ms
favicons
386 ms
embed.js
404 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
971 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
966 ms
bootstrap.min.js
969 ms
twitter-bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
968 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
794 ms
jquery.blockui.min.js
964 ms
jquery.cokie.min.js
965 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
969 ms
app.js
969 ms
favicons
2332 ms
favicons
701 ms
favicons
436 ms
favicons
420 ms
favicons
415 ms
favicons
441 ms
favicons
468 ms
favicons
487 ms
favicons
4503 ms
favicons
965 ms
favicons
1782 ms
favicons
2034 ms
favicons
1574 ms
favicons
2650 ms
favicons
2094 ms
thumbs.php
93 ms
font.css
95 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
233 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
204 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
233 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
204 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
294 ms
zrt_lookup.html
27 ms
show_ads_impl.js
42 ms
ads
197 ms
portlet-collapse-icon.png
126 ms
osd.js
52 ms
fetchComponent
1517 ms
ads
225 ms
m_js_controller.js
86 ms
abg.js
111 ms
ga.js
42 ms
300lo.json
92 ms
462.e1ea0a277a6d8506fcc8.js
40 ms
counter.8eb9e83b9fa0d4af1e4f.js
40 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
44 ms
__utm.gif
74 ms
favicon
91 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
79 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
61 ms
s
53 ms
x_button_blue2.png
47 ms
shares.json
38 ms
favicon
45 ms
thumbs.php
95 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
3 ms
css
25 ms
674809543-embed-css.css
4 ms
async_survey
14 ms
1178091007-time-chart-embed-js-bin.js
12 ms
17 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
prompt_embed_static.js
7 ms
ui+en.css
28 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,corechart+en.I.js
30 ms
collect
78 ms
1583270285-google-logo-embed.png
6 ms
tooltip.css
83 ms
ru.whoisbucket.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ru.whoisbucket.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ru.whoisbucket.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ru.whoisbucket.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ru.whoisbucket.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ru.whoisbucket.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ru Whoisbucket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: