Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

saginalavide.wordpress.com

Saginalavide | This WordPress.com site is the bee's knees

Page Load Speed

892 ms in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

695 ms

Page Rendered

181 ms

saginalavide.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Saginalavide Word Press content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about saginalavide.wordpress.com

This WordPress.com site is the bee's knees

Visit saginalavide.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Saginalavide.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 876 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

saginalavide.wordpress.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

saginalavide.wordpress.com

16 ms

saginalavide.wordpress.com

176 ms

107 ms

css

155 ms

style.css

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Saginalavide.wordpress.com, 20% (7 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) relates to the external source S.skimresources.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 448.2 kB (74%)

Content Size

602.4 kB

After Optimization

154.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Saginalavide.wordpress.com main page is 602.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 498.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 34.5 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 370.4 kB

  • Original 498.1 kB
  • After minification 388.4 kB
  • After compression 127.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 370.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

  • Original 69.8 kB
  • After minification 66.6 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saginalavide.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (70%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saginalavide Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

saginalavide.wordpress.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

saginalavide.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

saginalavide.wordpress.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saginalavide.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saginalavide.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Saginalavide Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: