Tools & Wizards About Us
wallpaperama.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

Page Load Speed

13.2 sec in total

First Response

217 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

9.3 sec

wallpaperama.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wallpaperama content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wallpaperama.com

Visit wallpaperama.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wallpaperama.com page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 13 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wallpaperama.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.282

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wallpaperama.com

217 ms

lab-min.js

151 ms

ga.js

152 ms

bootstrap.3.2.0-min.css

117 ms

christina-milian.jpg

2467 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Wallpaperama.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wallpaperama.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 391.7 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wallpaperama.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 37.9 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wallpaperama images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 177.2 kB

  • Original 270.8 kB
  • After minification 263.3 kB
  • After compression 93.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 157.6 kB

  • Original 194.2 kB
  • After minification 190.6 kB
  • After compression 36.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wallpaperama.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wallpaperama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wallpaperama.com

www.wallpaperama.com

217 ms

lab-min.js

lab-min.js

151 ms

ga.js

ga.js

152 ms

bootstrap.3.2.0-min.css

bootstrap.3.2.0-min.css

117 ms

christina-milian.jpg

christina-milian.jpg

2467 ms

car-t661.jpg

car-t661.jpg

1692 ms

dragon-slayer-t1506.jpg

dragon-slayer-t1506.jpg

1693 ms

a-dreamy-world-1-t777.jpg

a-dreamy-world-1-t777.jpg

1666 ms

wallpaperama-min.css

wallpaperama-min.css

1664 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

263 ms

eiffel-tower-t1377.jpg

eiffel-tower-t1377.jpg

259 ms

dinobots-t1320.jpg

dinobots-t1320.jpg

184 ms

white-tigers-t659.jpg

white-tigers-t659.jpg

176 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

56 ms

jquery.livequery.min.js

jquery.livequery.min.js

432 ms

bootstrap-min.js

bootstrap-min.js

341 ms

wallpaperama-wallpapers-min.js

wallpaperama-wallpapers-min.js

340 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

356 ms

Accessibility Review

wallpaperama.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wallpaperama.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wallpaperama.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wallpaperama.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wallpaperama.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wallpaperama.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wallpaperama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: