3.6 sec in total
339 ms
2.3 sec
995 ms
Welcome to walls.io homepage info - get ready to check Walls best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about walls.io
Use a social wall to engage your audience with user-generated content that increases brand awareness at events, on displays & on your website.
Visit walls.ioWe analyzed Walls.io page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
walls.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value13.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value5,330 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
339 ms
484 ms
84 ms
125 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Walls.io, 6% (3 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Walls.io.
Page size can be reduced by 338.0 kB (24%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Walls.io main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 900.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 315 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Walls images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 204.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.7 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Walls.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (23%)
48
37
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Walls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
walls.io
339 ms
walls.io
484 ms
bootstrap.min.css
84 ms
css
125 ms
font-awesome.css
95 ms
landing.css
148 ms
jquery.min.js
128 ms
framework.js
381 ms
landing.js
418 ms
2791683708.js
416 ms
load.sumome.com
578 ms
icon-events-big.png
331 ms
icon-hashtag-big.png
330 ms
icon-mobile-big.png
329 ms
icon-api-big.png
329 ms
ycombinator.jpg
423 ms
avengers.png
534 ms
starbucks.png
421 ms
barcamp.png
418 ms
facebook.png
428 ms
twitter.png
526 ms
google-plus.png
523 ms
instagram.png
518 ms
youtube.png
518 ms
pinterest.png
519 ms
vine.png
598 ms
vimeo.png
593 ms
foursquare.png
595 ms
swarm.png
595 ms
flickr.png
594 ms
tumblr.png
621 ms
appdotnet.png
659 ms
reddit.png
664 ms
rss.png
666 ms
fbds.js
305 ms
bg-1920.jpg
1053 ms
event-wall-plus-figures.png
769 ms
hashtag.png
610 ms
pad.png
666 ms
clouds-left.png
581 ms
clouds-right.png
584 ms
phone.png
676 ms
api-diagram.png
775 ms
bg-formular.png
704 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
107 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
124 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5 ms
analytics.js
108 ms
119 ms
collect
51 ms
intercom.v1.js
31 ms
29 ms
cbz5evr8
37 ms
intercom.bcfdf787.js
58 ms
walls.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
walls.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
walls.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Walls.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Walls.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
walls.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Walls. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: