3.3 sec in total
852 ms
2.2 sec
309 ms
Welcome to wanting.com homepage info - get ready to check Wanting best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wanting.com
Visit wanting.comWe analyzed Wanting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 852 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wanting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.6 s
0/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value2,570 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.172
70/100
15%
Value23.0 s
1/100
10%
852 ms
87 ms
52 ms
4 ms
12 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Wanting.com, 21% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (852 ms) belongs to the original domain Wanting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (76%)
1.4 MB
321.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Wanting.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 843.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 297.8 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 843.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 451 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wanting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 180.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.8 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wanting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (59%)
46
19
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wanting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wanting.com
852 ms
css.css
87 ms
autosuggest_inquisitor.css
52 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
4 ms
jquery-ui.js
12 ms
liquidmetal.js
82 ms
bsn.AutoSuggest_c_2.0.js
130 ms
adsbygoogle.js
15 ms
all.js
150 ms
ca-pub-7906155203048995.js
121 ms
zrt_lookup.html
140 ms
show_ads_impl.js
84 ms
104 ms
xd_arbiter.php
140 ms
xd_arbiter.php
298 ms
ads
193 ms
osd.js
31 ms
m_js_controller.js
28 ms
abg.js
39 ms
favicon
66 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
53 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
27 ms
s
28 ms
x_button_blue2.png
14 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
4 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
51 ms
mlink3.php
384 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
100 ms
js
6 ms
in.php
141 ms
pgstores.php
174 ms
like_box.php
59 ms
jquery.1.9.1.min.js
80 ms
vglnk.js
20 ms
products
114 ms
xYm_UD1pmAz.css
162 ms
TGpOWuX6Pv8.css
201 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
276 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
346 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
297 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
297 ms
mlink.php
636 ms
activeview
13 ms
253490_213509078670650_1723348_n.jpg
167 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
39 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
39 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
40 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
74 ms
wanting.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wanting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wanting.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wanting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wanting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wanting.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wanting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: