2.5 sec in total
344 ms
1.9 sec
190 ms
Click here to check amazing Wayback content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wayback.co
Loverino Speech API
Visit wayback.coWe analyzed Wayback.co page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
wayback.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value2,920 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
344 ms
635 ms
699 ms
1075 ms
402 ms
Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wayback.co, 40% (6 requests) were made to App.loverino.com and 27% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 29.5 kB (54%)
54.3 kB
24.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Wayback.co main page is 54.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 26.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wayback.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)
8
5
The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wayback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wayback.co
344 ms
application-e21418bfaf4a8a654c19ff69ab5a872877ff6268638f7f9660b8a975757b4869.css
635 ms
application-58c6e0867cf5d49020ce15bb06954dd949936fdb754ed60ead69b04920c081d1.js
699 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1075 ms
css
402 ms
show_ads.js
175 ms
logo.png
161 ms
notes.png
502 ms
kids.jpg
347 ms
phone.jpg
350 ms
ca-pub-6151772909735990.js
333 ms
zrt_lookup.html
231 ms
show_ads_impl.js
234 ms
ads
55 ms
osd.js
20 ms
wayback.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
wayback.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wayback.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wayback.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wayback.co main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
wayback.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wayback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: