9.6 sec in total
2.2 sec
6.8 sec
622 ms
Visit webmission.in now to see the best up-to-date Webmission content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmission.in
Web Mission Technologies is a leading web development company that is providing quality IT services to the customers and creating a revolution in the field of Information Technology.
Visit webmission.inWe analyzed Webmission.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
webmission.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
2166 ms
203 ms
168 ms
709 ms
480 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Webmission.in, 23% (27 requests) were made to Google.com and 15% (18 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmission.in.
Page size can be reduced by 151.8 kB (12%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Webmission.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 820.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmission images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmission.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (48%)
104
54
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmission. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmission.in
2166 ms
css
203 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
168 ms
bootstrap.min.css
709 ms
bootstrap-reset.css
480 ms
flexslider.css
477 ms
magnific-popup.css
476 ms
font-awesome.min.css
489 ms
style.css
702 ms
banner.css
725 ms
colors.css
698 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
1171 ms
style.min.css
750 ms
css
153 ms
style.css
922 ms
jquery.min.js
1472 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
936 ms
bootstrap.min.js
910 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
962 ms
skrollr.min.js
1127 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
1135 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1419 ms
jquery.isotope.sloppy-masonry.js
1419 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
1896 ms
js
181 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1566 ms
waypoints.min.js
1566 ms
jquery.tweet.js
1431 ms
common.js
1799 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1883 ms
navigation.js
1884 ms
global.js
1884 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
1883 ms
analytics.js
379 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
515 ms
embed
483 ms
logo.png
516 ms
arrow.png
514 ms
ban6.jpg
816 ms
magic-pixel.png
516 ms
background-image1.jpg
1317 ms
webdesigning.png
512 ms
development.png
751 ms
seo.png
814 ms
writting.png
814 ms
web-isdustrial.png
1440 ms
graphic-isdustrial.png
2287 ms
development-isdustrial.png
1257 ms
background-testimonials.jpg
1779 ms
avatar5.png
1030 ms
avatar.png
1256 ms
avatar6.png
1447 ms
marker.png
1451 ms
phone.png
1522 ms
mail.png
1671 ms
magnifier.png
1679 ms
collect
122 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
116 ms
fontawesome-webfontba72.woff
1585 ms
js
57 ms
gen_204
24 ms
init_embed.js
127 ms
gen_204
72 ms
common.js
153 ms
util.js
161 ms
map.js
148 ms
marker.js
147 ms
overlay.js
83 ms
onion.js
67 ms
search_impl.js
66 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
69 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
109 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
98 ms
google-marker.png
1016 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
51 ms
vt
173 ms
vt
146 ms
vt
132 ms
vt
133 ms
vt
203 ms
vt
131 ms
vt
211 ms
vt
212 ms
vt
216 ms
vt
216 ms
vt
213 ms
vt
220 ms
vt
236 ms
vt
267 ms
vt
268 ms
vt
288 ms
vt
270 ms
vt
271 ms
vt
284 ms
vt
286 ms
vt
288 ms
vt
318 ms
vt
331 ms
vt
320 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
76 ms
QuotaService.RecordEvent
33 ms
vt
333 ms
vt
309 ms
QuotaService.RecordEvent
100 ms
controls.js
13 ms
google_gray.svg
25 ms
css
102 ms
css
100 ms
entity11.png
49 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
38 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
60 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
235 ms
transparent.png
20 ms
google-marker.png
783 ms
webmission.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webmission.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webmission.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmission.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmission.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmission.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webmission. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: