5.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.1 sec
250 ms
Click here to check amazing Websiteworth content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websiteworth.net
Visit websiteworth.netWe analyzed Websiteworth.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
websiteworth.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
1096 ms
420 ms
397 ms
72 ms
404 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Websiteworth.net, 70% (38 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 196.4 kB (62%)
318.7 kB
122.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Websiteworth.net main page is 318.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 134.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websiteworth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websiteworth.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (81%)
53
10
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websiteworth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
websiteworth.net
1096 ms
bootstrap.css
420 ms
style_frontend.css
397 ms
jquery.min.js
72 ms
bootstrap.min.js
404 ms
app.js
395 ms
favicons
88 ms
pattern_paper.png
194 ms
logo.png
302 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
224 ms
index_well_icon.png
171 ms
tag.png
194 ms
pr_0.gif
280 ms
pr_3.gif
280 ms
top.png
321 ms
favicons
71 ms
favicons
72 ms
favicons
76 ms
favicons
76 ms
favicons
73 ms
favicons
62 ms
favicons
66 ms
favicons
61 ms
favicons
62 ms
favicons
66 ms
favicons
63 ms
favicons
64 ms
favicons
66 ms
favicons
72 ms
favicons
70 ms
favicons
67 ms
favicons
98 ms
favicons
95 ms
favicons
72 ms
favicons
67 ms
favicons
67 ms
favicons
100 ms
favicons
100 ms
favicons
111 ms
favicons
104 ms
favicons
96 ms
favicons
105 ms
favicons
608 ms
favicons
1111 ms
favicons
480 ms
favicons
1352 ms
favicons
166 ms
favicons
132 ms
favicons
808 ms
favicons
2167 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
favicons
963 ms
favicons
2426 ms
collect
25 ms
websiteworth.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
websiteworth.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
websiteworth.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websiteworth.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Websiteworth.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websiteworth.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Websiteworth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: