Tools & Wizards About Us
webspellchecker.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

webspellchecker.net

Multilingual spelling and grammar check online solutions | WebSpellChecker

Page Load Speed

591 ms in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

416 ms

Page Rendered

162 ms

webspellchecker.net screenshot

About Website

Visit webspellchecker.net now to see the best up-to-date Web Spell Checker content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webspellchecker.net

Grammar check online and spelling correction solutions for websites and web apps. Support 20+ languages. Available on-premise. Grammar check API.

Visit webspellchecker.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webspellchecker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 578 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webspellchecker.net performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value15,280 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webspellchecker.net

13 ms

www.webspellchecker.net

168 ms

all.css

16 ms

ie.css

9 ms

cookieconsent.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Webspellchecker.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (168 ms) belongs to the original domain Webspellchecker.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 667.7 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

604.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webspellchecker.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 582.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 27.1 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 68.3 kB

  • Original 477.4 kB
  • After minification 409.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Spell Checker needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 418.4 kB

  • Original 582.2 kB
  • After minification 566.2 kB
  • After compression 163.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 418.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 155.6 kB

  • Original 182.1 kB
  • After minification 156.4 kB
  • After compression 26.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webspellchecker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (18%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Spell Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webspellchecker.net

webspellchecker.net

13 ms

www.webspellchecker.net

www.webspellchecker.net

168 ms

all.css

all.css

16 ms

ie.css

ie.css

9 ms

cookieconsent.js

cookieconsent.js

7 ms

cookieconsent-config.js

cookieconsent-config.js

9 ms

ie.js

ie.js

9 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

35 ms

jquery.main.js

jquery.main.js

33 ms

ga.js

ga.js

42 ms

default

default

64 ms

is_logged.pl

is_logged.pl

128 ms

ssrv.cgi

ssrv.cgi

132 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

29 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

32 ms

bg-nav-p.png

bg-nav-p.png

31 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

29 ms

page.jpg

page.jpg

30 ms

demos.gif

demos.gif

30 ms

img97.jpg

img97.jpg

30 ms

img96.png

img96.png

33 ms

bg-btn.gif

bg-btn.gif

31 ms

bg-arrows.gif

bg-arrows.gif

32 ms

bg-picture-free.gif

bg-picture-free.gif

72 ms

btn-download.gif

btn-download.gif

33 ms

WebSpellchecker-GRAYT.gif

WebSpellchecker-GRAYT.gif

70 ms

wsc-scayt-multi-language-300x248.png

wsc-scayt-multi-language-300x248.png

54 ms

WSC_PostCard.png

WSC_PostCard.png

73 ms

newsletter_copy.gif

newsletter_copy.gif

71 ms

subscibe.gif

subscibe.gif

72 ms

bg-login.gif

bg-login.gif

76 ms

bg-go.gif

bg-go.gif

72 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

icons.png

icons.png

64 ms

44a58dae7be0bebfdedf6a244ff40731daa363cb

44a58dae7be0bebfdedf6a244ff40731daa363cb

75 ms

cookieconsent.css

cookieconsent.css

74 ms

Accessibility Review

webspellchecker.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webspellchecker.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

webspellchecker.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webspellchecker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webspellchecker.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webspellchecker.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Spell Checker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: