2.4 sec in total
573 ms
1.6 sec
220 ms
Visit webstream.in now to see the best up-to-date Webstream content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webstream.in
We are a web design firm and our aim is that with our services, we should help you in getting more business than ever before
Visit webstream.inWe analyzed Webstream.in page load time and found that the first response time was 573 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Webstream.in rating and web reputation
webstream.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.185
66/100
15%
Value5.6 s
69/100
10%
573 ms
73 ms
80 ms
117 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Webstream.in, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) belongs to the original domain Webstream.in.
Page size can be reduced by 411.5 kB (43%)
950.0 kB
538.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Webstream.in main page is 950.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 650.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 188.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webstream needs image optimization as it can save up to 188.2 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webstream.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 129.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (38%)
42
26
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webstream.in
573 ms
base.css
73 ms
framework.css
80 ms
style.css
117 ms
noscript.css
84 ms
css
27 ms
jquery.min.js
27 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
76 ms
tooltip.js
74 ms
dropdown.js
137 ms
tinynav.min.js
147 ms
camera.min.js
145 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
176 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
149 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
203 ms
ddaccordion.js
237 ms
jquery.twitter.js
219 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
217 ms
faq-functions.js
232 ms
theme-functions.js
210 ms
loading2.gif
73 ms
social-open.gif
79 ms
social10.gif
74 ms
social32.gif
92 ms
social9.gif
73 ms
social15.gif
77 ms
social25.gif
143 ms
logo.png
176 ms
slide-shadow.png
141 ms
slide3.png
269 ms
slide2.png
256 ms
bg-slide1.jpg
232 ms
link-zoom.png
219 ms
front-img1.jpg
316 ms
link-url.png
267 ms
front-img2.jpg
400 ms
link-more.png
304 ms
front-img3.jpg
346 ms
link-video.png
343 ms
front-img4.jpg
456 ms
front-icon1.png
372 ms
front-icon2.png
350 ms
front-icon3.png
412 ms
btn-arrow.png
381 ms
ui.totop.png
387 ms
camera_skins.png
394 ms
loading-slideshow.gif
449 ms
bg-slide3.jpg
513 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
10 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
bg-slide2.jpg
165 ms
webstream.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
webstream.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webstream.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webstream.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webstream.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webstream.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webstream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: