3.9 sec in total
553 ms
3 sec
354 ms
Click here to check amazing Webtun content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webtun.com
Веб обозрение. Обзор новых и полезных веб-сервисов и ресурсов в сети. Обзор браузеров и полезные советы в простом изложении.
Visit webtun.comWe analyzed Webtun.com page load time and found that the first response time was 553 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
webtun.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.075
95/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
553 ms
379 ms
22 ms
247 ms
249 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Webtun.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Webtun.com.
Page size can be reduced by 213.7 kB (53%)
402.9 kB
189.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Webtun.com main page is 402.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 119.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webtun needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtun.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (46%)
76
41
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtun. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
webtun.com
553 ms
index.php
379 ms
webfont.js
22 ms
webfont.js
247 ms
default.css
249 ms
styles.css
249 ms
engine.css
413 ms
libs.js
250 ms
upTT.js
371 ms
widgets.js
88 ms
zp.js
661 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8 ms
show_ads.js
10 ms
top100.jcn
397 ms
watch.js
180 ms
watch.js
449 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif
270 ms
1307038709_468x60.gif
154 ms
vkontakte.gif
154 ms
facebook.gif
154 ms
yandex.gif
153 ms
google.gif
153 ms
spacer.gif
153 ms
svobodno.jpg
278 ms
twitter_cloud.png
277 ms
facebook_cloud.png
276 ms
ff_cloud.png
275 ms
feed_cloud.png
742 ms
yandex_cloud.png
859 ms
google_cloud2.png
397 ms
google_cloud3.png
396 ms
yand-add-b.png
398 ms
1316899020_orphoraf.gif
400 ms
promobil.png
623 ms
arrow.png
503 ms
pagebg.png
505 ms
gradblue.png
545 ms
search.png
626 ms
ca-pub-8410046794874824.js
103 ms
zrt_lookup.html
114 ms
show_ads_impl.js
55 ms
mctopfoot.png
609 ms
lsideaplha.png
614 ms
rsidebg.png
728 ms
lsidebg.png
731 ms
midbtl.png
735 ms
pfbulletinsanspro-medium-webfont.woff
732 ms
vlines.png
804 ms
pager.png
833 ms
rsidetop.png
838 ms
rsidebtl.png
842 ms
vmenuline.png
859 ms
vmenu.png
918 ms
ireg.png
1597 ms
copybg.png
958 ms
top100.scn
174 ms
hit
303 ms
ads
315 ms
osd.js
16 ms
ads
245 ms
counter2
192 ms
code.js
308 ms
impression.html
312 ms
sync
275 ms
extra.js
313 ms
advert.gif
144 ms
hit
130 ms
1
168 ms
3322940178227500612
60 ms
abg.js
20 ms
m_js_controller.js
29 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
67 ms
s
32 ms
x_button_blue2.png
33 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
7 ms
576698
86 ms
counter
221 ms
pixel
22 ms
386 ms
match
93 ms
support.html
160 ms
activeview
14 ms
tracker
465 ms
ui
42 ms
webtun.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webtun.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webtun.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtun.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webtun.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
webtun.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webtun. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: