1.4 sec in total
117 ms
1.1 sec
216 ms
Visit welikesmall.com now to see the best up-to-date Welikesmall content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about welikesmall.com
Visit welikesmall.comWe analyzed Welikesmall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
welikesmall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value2,160 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
117 ms
62 ms
24 ms
77 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Welikesmall.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (635 ms) belongs to the original domain Welikesmall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 364.4 kB (8%)
4.5 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Welikesmall.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Welikesmall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 126.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 126.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Welikesmall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (11%)
71
63
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Welikesmall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
welikesmall.com
117 ms
www.welikesmall.com
62 ms
screen.css
24 ms
magnific-popup.css
77 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
85 ms
jquery.min.js
61 ms
waypoints.min.js
7 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
5 ms
picturefill.js
6 ms
image_sequence.js
7 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
139 ms
home.js
135 ms
bg_swim.jpg
149 ms
logo_shade.png
4 ms
logo_seq.png
96 ms
logo.png
80 ms
logo.png
92 ms
logo.png
188 ms
logo.png
123 ms
logo.png
157 ms
button_seq.png
259 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
51 ms
bg.jpg
181 ms
bg.jpg
191 ms
bg.jpg
182 ms
bg.jpg
181 ms
bg.jpg
207 ms
story.gif
635 ms
story.gif
370 ms
story.gif
318 ms
story.gif
368 ms
reel.gif
372 ms
sanchez.woff
216 ms
gibson-bold.woff
276 ms
gibson-semibold.woff
284 ms
signal-no1-d.woff
331 ms
collect
11 ms
TweenMax.min.js
278 ms
jquery.superscrollorama.js
286 ms
work.js
286 ms
work_index.js
318 ms
wave_seq.png
395 ms
header_container.png
347 ms
grid_evo.jpg
323 ms
grid_jordan.jpg
323 ms
grid_cokeahh.jpg
375 ms
af_small.jpg
326 ms
grid_purity.jpg
438 ms
grid_amx.jpg
356 ms
academyawards.jpg
351 ms
mlb_small.jpg
364 ms
grid_moment_sm.jpg
361 ms
joujou.jpg
368 ms
specialized.jpg
432 ms
smokeybones.jpg
368 ms
sanchez-semibold.woff
348 ms
sanchez-semibold-italic.woff
350 ms
sanchez-italic.woff
321 ms
ancestry.jpg
401 ms
snowbird.jpg
309 ms
google.jpg
306 ms
benjaminmoore.jpg
299 ms
census.jpg
352 ms
bugaboo.jpg
463 ms
coke.jpg
352 ms
quiksilver.jpg
337 ms
hyundai.jpg
314 ms
ge.jpg
411 ms
browning.jpg
332 ms
header_bg.jpg
294 ms
index.png
266 ms
close.png
358 ms
favorite.jpg
336 ms
favorite.png
268 ms
footer.png
270 ms
twitter_footer.png
273 ms
facebook_footer.png
372 ms
vimeo_footer.png
339 ms
arrow.png
362 ms
welikesmall.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
welikesmall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
welikesmall.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Welikesmall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Welikesmall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
welikesmall.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Welikesmall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: