3.6 sec in total
261 ms
2.9 sec
469 ms
Visit wemake.in now to see the best up-to-date Wemake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wemake.in
DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this wemake.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.
Visit wemake.inWe analyzed Wemake.in page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
wemake.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value610 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
261 ms
301 ms
319 ms
122 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wemake.in, 64% (25 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (973 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 57.0 kB (33%)
173.2 kB
116.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Wemake.in main page is 173.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 82.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wemake needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 140 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wemake.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (49%)
35
18
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wemake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wemake.in
261 ms
wemake.in
301 ms
wemake.in
319 ms
googlefonts.css
122 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
164 ms
icon.css
177 ms
style4.css
173 ms
jquery.js
520 ms
fittext.js
248 ms
platform.js
684 ms
js
133 ms
logo.png
703 ms
trust-stamp.png
704 ms
payment.png
705 ms
money-back1.png
707 ms
transfer1.png
732 ms
secure-payment1.png
733 ms
money-back-w.png
735 ms
money-back-img1.png
750 ms
money-back-img2.png
752 ms
money-back-img3.png
751 ms
transper-img1.png
971 ms
transper-img2.png
972 ms
secure-payment-img1.png
969 ms
secure-payment-img2.png
973 ms
default
501 ms
sdk.js
506 ms
fontello.woff
371 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
39 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
36 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
117 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
69 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
71 ms
twk-main.js
75 ms
twk-vendor.js
59 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
73 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
74 ms
twk-runtime.js
105 ms
twk-app.js
103 ms
wemake.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
wemake.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
wemake.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wemake.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wemake.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wemake.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wemake. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: