4.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.1 sec
147 ms
Visit whatson.london now to see the best up-to-date Whatson content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whatson.london
The domain name whatson.london is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit whatson.londonWe analyzed Whatson.london page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
whatson.london performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value11,580 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.153
75/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
1080 ms
112 ms
199 ms
250 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Whatson.london, 17% (13 requests) were made to S0.2mdn.net and 11% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Whatson.london.
Page size can be reduced by 142.5 kB (33%)
429.5 kB
287.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Whatson.london main page is 429.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 312.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whatson needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 101.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.8 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whatson.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (66%)
73
25
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whatson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whatson.london
1080 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
112 ms
flick.css
199 ms
whatson.london
250 ms
author-post-ratings.css
187 ms
jetpack.css
193 ms
style.css
270 ms
aqua-black.css
209 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.autocomplete.css
288 ms
markerclusterer_compiled.js
285 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
scrollTo.js
286 ms
jquery.form.min.js
305 ms
mailchimp.js
344 ms
core.min.js
371 ms
datepicker.js
387 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
378 ms
widget.min.js
380 ms
position.min.js
399 ms
ui.autocomplete.js
444 ms
selectbox.min.js
478 ms
theme-scripts.js
482 ms
superfish.js
481 ms
pepper-ginder-custom.css
505 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.js
515 ms
jquery-ui.multidatespicker.js
538 ms
home.css
579 ms
js.js
582 ms
adsbygoogle.js
26 ms
e-202239.js
4 ms
blank1.png
251 ms
r-16.png
113 ms
t-16.png
93 ms
f-16.png
93 ms
header_bg.jpg
192 ms
zrt_lookup.html
61 ms
show_ads_impl.js
104 ms
btn-orange.gif
151 ms
ui-bg_fine-grain_10_eceadf_60x60.png
104 ms
cookie.js
45 ms
integrator.js
49 ms
ads
447 ms
html_inpage_rendering_lib_200_276.js
105 ms
omrhp.js
7 ms
UFYwWwmt.js
93 ms
m_js_controller.js
141 ms
window_focus.js
242 ms
qs_click_protection.js
157 ms
rx_lidar.js
91 ms
abg_lite.js
251 ms
icon.png
40 ms
Enqz_20U.html
144 ms
activeview
29 ms
sodar
45 ms
dvtp_src.js
151 ms
index.html
38 ms
spp.pl
142 ms
ds.png
54 ms
-Y38d37a1DmvdXzRnIUkD6jTpQ2urOaWudC6FG_jR1g.js
31 ms
katalyst_scrollbar.css
58 ms
styles.css
80 ms
Enabler_01_247.js
81 ms
gsap.min.js
142 ms
katalyst_scrollbar.min.js
79 ms
scripts.js
397 ms
sodar2.js
88 ms
nurtec-logo.png
13 ms
verticle-line.png
11 ms
aio-lock-up-top.png
10 ms
aio-lock-up-middle.png
11 ms
aio-lock-up-bottom.png
38 ms
biohaven-logo.png
39 ms
dv-measurements3094.js
84 ms
runner.html
34 ms
aframe
80 ms
sodar
23 ms
whatson.london accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
whatson.london best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
whatson.london SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whatson.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whatson.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whatson.london
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whatson. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: