Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

whitecashback.in

Whitecashback

Page Load Speed

10.8 sec in total

First Response

763 ms

Resources Loaded

9.5 sec

Page Rendered

559 ms

whitecashback.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whitecashback content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whitecashback.in

Whitecashback.in-Cashback site in India offers best cashback offers, get cashback coupons on purchase from more than 200 online stores of India.

Visit whitecashback.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Whitecashback.in page load time and found that the first response time was 763 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whitecashback.in performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whitecashback.in

763 ms

www.whitecashback.in

4456 ms

foundation.css

509 ms

styles.css

504 ms

responsive.css

526 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Whitecashback.in, 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Whitecashback.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 579.4 kB (61%)

Content Size

945.2 kB

After Optimization

365.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Whitecashback.in main page is 945.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 484.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 61.0 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 175.1 kB
  • After minification 173.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitecashback images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 342.7 kB

  • Original 484.6 kB
  • After minification 482.7 kB
  • After compression 142.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 183.4 kB

  • Original 222.2 kB
  • After minification 221.7 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitecashback.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 183.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (40%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitecashback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whitecashback.in accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

whitecashback.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

whitecashback.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitecashback.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Whitecashback.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whitecashback. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: