6.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.9 sec
757 ms
Welcome to wildlifereporter.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Wildlife Reporter best content right away, or after learning these important things about wildlifereporter.co.uk
Home Page
Visit wildlifereporter.co.ukWe analyzed Wildlifereporter.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
wildlifereporter.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.112
86/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
1383 ms
175 ms
186 ms
185 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Wildlifereporter.co.uk, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Wildlifereporter.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 651.6 kB (41%)
1.6 MB
921.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Wildlifereporter.co.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 749.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wildlife Reporter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 372.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 372.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 187.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wildlifereporter.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 187.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (39%)
87
53
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wildlife Reporter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wildlifereporter.co.uk
1383 ms
ribbon.css
175 ms
thumbs_style.css
186 ms
slimbox.css
185 ms
rquote.css
184 ms
style_common.css
186 ms
slideshow.css
216 ms
jquery.min.js
514 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
276 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
272 ms
caption.js
270 ms
bootstrap.min.js
353 ms
mootools-core.js
554 ms
core.js
358 ms
mootools-more.js
836 ms
html5fallback.js
369 ms
mthash.js
440 ms
eprivacy.js
450 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
457 ms
slimbox2.js
534 ms
system.css
543 ms
reset.css
546 ms
typo.css
598 ms
bootstrap.css
1042 ms
template.css
632 ms
nexus.css
716 ms
responsive-nav.css
646 ms
responsive.css
687 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
css
45 ms
css
49 ms
responsive-nav.js
716 ms
dropdown.js
751 ms
jquery.slides.min.js
782 ms
system.css
97 ms
jstuff.css
93 ms
c3d1065eacadd1f97d1d54cb962a4f7ac1e9e874.png
404 ms
background.jpg
401 ms
facebook.png
398 ms
youtube.png
400 ms
vimeo.png
398 ms
searchBox.png
399 ms
wildlifereporter.co.uk
1152 ms
logo.png
401 ms
menu_shadow.png
401 ms
prev.png
404 ms
next.png
401 ms
1080x300_B&W_1.jpg
559 ms
1080x300_B&W_2.jpg
553 ms
1080x300_B&W_3.jpg
634 ms
1080x300_B&W_4.jpg
405 ms
1080x300_B&W_5.jpg
635 ms
1080x300_B&W_6.jpg
573 ms
etherow_5sec_8.gif
818 ms
eagle_200.png
735 ms
various_5sec_1.gif
861 ms
etherow_country_park_compstall_200_422.jpg
743 ms
etherow_country_park_compstall_200_053.jpg
746 ms
coots_9_200_711.jpg
842 ms
dunham_massey_200_095.jpg
834 ms
Scarlet_Lily_Beetle_200_1.jpg
839 ms
12_dunham_massey_200x150.jpg
1018 ms
1015_524.jpg
936 ms
1102_524.jpg
937 ms
1148_524.jpg
939 ms
25_524.jpg
952 ms
502_524.jpg
1027 ms
520_524.jpg
1026 ms
522_524.jpg
1030 ms
541_524.jpg
1040 ms
62_524.jpg
1108 ms
657_524.jpg
1113 ms
74_524.jpg
1079 ms
0IZPA9DbzKXnGZABsAivT4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
38 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
39 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
313 ms
IcoMoon.svg
813 ms
764_524.jpg
743 ms
789_524.jpg
847 ms
805_524.jpg
811 ms
c3d1065eacadd1f97d1d54cb962a4f7ac1e9e874.png
129 ms
807_524.jpg
810 ms
926_524.jpg
851 ms
arrow.png
857 ms
245x163_top2_5.png
975 ms
trans.png
894 ms
link.png
860 ms
245x163_top2_3.png
743 ms
245x163_top2_1.png
892 ms
245x163_top2_2.png
949 ms
bullet1.png
750 ms
wildlifereporter.co.uk accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wildlifereporter.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
wildlifereporter.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wildlifereporter.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wildlifereporter.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wildlifereporter.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wildlife Reporter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: