1.9 sec in total
504 ms
1.3 sec
161 ms
Click here to check amazing Wiretooth content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wiretooth.com
Wiretooth Technologies LTD
Visit wiretooth.comWe analyzed Wiretooth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 504 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
wiretooth.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
89/100
10%
504 ms
175 ms
60 ms
230 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Wiretooth.com, 28% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (504 ms) belongs to the original domain Wiretooth.com.
Page size can be reduced by 179.4 kB (70%)
256.9 kB
77.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Wiretooth.com main page is 256.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 337 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wiretooth needs image optimization as it can save up to 337 B or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 99.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wiretooth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)
11
6
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wiretooth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wiretooth.com
504 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
css
60 ms
genericons.css
230 ms
style.css
284 ms
jquery.js
346 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
164 ms
functions.js
253 ms
wp-embed.min.js
252 ms
bbe486c336d0e1f32ae4b6b3f41c0548
130 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4ENqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
55 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nqp5NA6AAOjfQM_HmvD0shQ.ttf
66 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngvr42gIYPGl20Rgir8ypAU.ttf
82 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
86 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
94 ms
Genericons.svg
313 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
1 ms
wiretooth.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
wiretooth.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wiretooth.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wiretooth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wiretooth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wiretooth.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wiretooth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: