3.1 sec in total
239 ms
2.3 sec
586 ms
Click here to check amazing Wol content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wol.gg
Have you ever wondered how much time you spend on LoL ? An average player has spent 832 hours on League of Legends and 8.468.557 players took the test. And you ?
Visit wol.ggWe analyzed Wol.gg page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
wol.gg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value60.8 s
0/100
10%
Value101,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value125.3 s
0/100
10%
239 ms
94 ms
190 ms
115 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Wol.gg, 39% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Use.fontawesome.com.
Page size can be reduced by 36.3 kB (27%)
136.9 kB
100.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Wol.gg main page is 136.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wol needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 79 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)
24
11
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wol.gg
239 ms
css
94 ms
app.js
190 ms
less.min.js
115 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
101 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
105 ms
all.js
1136 ms
dyj8pbcnat4xv.cloudfront.net
1134 ms
d2qnx6y010m4rt.cloudfront.net
169 ms
app.js
125 ms
email-decode.min.js
91 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
193 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
192 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
518 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
539 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
539 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
540 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
538 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
537 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
536 ms
wologo.png
376 ms
260-united-kingdom.svg
346 ms
224-portugal.svg
347 ms
094-south-korea.svg
352 ms
162-germany.svg
362 ms
128-spain.svg
534 ms
248-russia.svg
376 ms
195-france.svg
374 ms
211-poland.svg
430 ms
063-japan.svg
378 ms
000-none.png
381 ms
redspawn.png
410 ms
593 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0oA.woff
174 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0oA.woff
172 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0oA.woff
173 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0oA.woff
173 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0oA.woff
173 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0oA.woff
173 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0oA.woff
213 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0oA.woff
213 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0oA.woff
213 ms
analytics.js
211 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
71 ms
ga-audiences
81 ms
wol.gg accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wol.gg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wol.gg SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wol.gg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Wol.gg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wol.gg
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wol. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: