4 sec in total
437 ms
3.3 sec
226 ms
Welcome to wordeva.com homepage info - get ready to check Wordeva best content for Egypt right away, or after learning these important things about wordeva.com
wordeva is a Performance Network with more than five years of experience behind it. Completely focused on the marketing industry, we can offer a wide range of services and solutions for the webmasters...
Visit wordeva.comWe analyzed Wordeva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 437 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
wordeva.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.068
96/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
437 ms
218 ms
24 ms
324 ms
567 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Wordeva.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Wordeva.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (62%)
2.2 MB
825.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Wordeva.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wordeva needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 814.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 814.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 452.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordeva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 452.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (51%)
71
35
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordeva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wordeva.com
437 ms
javascripts.js
218 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
324 ms
bootstrap.min.css
567 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
219 ms
owl.carousel.css
219 ms
settings.css
535 ms
components.css
998 ms
style.css
647 ms
style-revolution-slider.css
435 ms
style-responsive.css
573 ms
red.css
653 ms
custom.css
745 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
1040 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
661 ms
bootstrap.min.js
871 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
872 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
867 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1201 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1481 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1481 ms
revo-slider-init.js
1156 ms
layout.js
1258 ms
atrk.js
166 ms
embed
695 ms
toggler.png
312 ms
bg9.jpg
686 ms
lady.png
1157 ms
bg1.jpg
706 ms
man-winner.png
693 ms
timer.png
760 ms
blockquote-corner.png
761 ms
img1-small.jpg
1026 ms
fa-angles.png
871 ms
client_1_gray.png
881 ms
client_1.png
1027 ms
client_2_gray.png
1025 ms
client_2.png
1154 ms
client_3_gray.png
1156 ms
client_3.png
1294 ms
client_4_gray.png
1293 ms
client_4.png
1294 ms
client_5_gray.png
1382 ms
client_5.png
1382 ms
client_6_gray.png
1393 ms
client_6.png
1479 ms
client_7_gray.png
1492 ms
client_7.png
1491 ms
client_8_gray.png
1593 ms
client_8.png
1600 ms
image_control.php
1632 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
71 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
71 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
72 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
90 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1824 ms
atrk.gif
56 ms
test.png
133 ms
widgets.js
98 ms
loader.gif
1028 ms
shadow1.png
1037 ms
large_left.png
1135 ms
large_right.png
1139 ms
js
92 ms
init_embed.js
55 ms
common.js
122 ms
map.js
153 ms
google4.png
48 ms
overlay.js
46 ms
util.js
139 ms
onion.js
138 ms
search_impl.js
140 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
199 ms
stats.js
72 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
81 ms
transparent.png
69 ms
kh
96 ms
controls.js
71 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
113 ms
vt
110 ms
css
68 ms
mapcnt6.png
30 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
22 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
34 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
45 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
40 ms
wordeva.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wordeva.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
wordeva.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordeva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wordeva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wordeva.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordeva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: