Tools & Wizards About Us
wouldisurviveanuke.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

wouldisurviveanuke.com

Would I Survive A Nuke.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

259 ms

wouldisurviveanuke.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wouldisurviveanuke.com homepage info - get ready to check Would I Survive A Nuke best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about wouldisurviveanuke.com

Find out if you would survive if a nuke was dropped near you.

Visit wouldisurviveanuke.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wouldisurviveanuke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wouldisurviveanuke.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,420 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.27

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wouldisurviveanuke.com

69 ms

jquery-ui.css

60 ms

bootstrap-combined.min.css

10 ms

site.css

30 ms

show_ads.js

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Wouldisurviveanuke.com, 45% (45 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (518 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 509.3 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

697.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wouldisurviveanuke.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 552.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 472.1 kB
  • After minification 465.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Would I Survive A Nuke images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 349.8 kB

  • Original 552.1 kB
  • After minification 545.8 kB
  • After compression 202.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 99.4 kB

  • Original 119.0 kB
  • After minification 114.3 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wouldisurviveanuke.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (51%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Would I Survive A Nuke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wouldisurviveanuke.com

wouldisurviveanuke.com

69 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

60 ms

bootstrap-combined.min.css

bootstrap-combined.min.css

10 ms

site.css

site.css

30 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

4 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

6 ms

js

js

56 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

115 ms

site.js

site.js

29 ms

nuke.js

nuke.js

27 ms

google.js

google.js

28 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

222 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

269 ms

ca-pub-0274342709325277.js

ca-pub-0274342709325277.js

272 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

266 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

151 ms

all.js

all.js

115 ms

ga.js

ga.js

202 ms

common.js

common.js

135 ms

map.js

map.js

184 ms

util.js

util.js

160 ms

geocoder.js

geocoder.js

154 ms

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

143 ms

407 ms

ads

ads

518 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

190 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

196 ms

osd.js

osd.js

176 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

152 ms

ads

ads

426 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

93 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

148 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

242 ms

onion.js

onion.js

131 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

123 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

87 ms

ads

ads

307 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

131 ms

stats.js

stats.js

129 ms

controls.js

controls.js

117 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

238 ms

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

90 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

178 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

177 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

225 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

150 ms

css

css

149 ms

marker.js

marker.js

110 ms

google4.png

google4.png

93 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

97 ms

sv5.png

sv5.png

97 ms

vt

vt

82 ms

vt

vt

77 ms

vt

vt

54 ms

vt

vt

59 ms

vt

vt

76 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

88 ms

vt

vt

88 ms

vt

vt

87 ms

vt

vt

88 ms

vt

vt

87 ms

vt

vt

86 ms

vt

vt

114 ms

vt

vt

119 ms

vt

vt

107 ms

vt

vt

114 ms

vt

vt

108 ms

vt

vt

114 ms

vt

vt

117 ms

vt

vt

136 ms

vt

vt

134 ms

vt

vt

133 ms

vt

vt

119 ms

vt

vt

134 ms

vt

vt

136 ms

vt

vt

138 ms

vt

vt

139 ms

vt

vt

142 ms

vt

vt

143 ms

vt

vt

143 ms

vt

vt

145 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

34 ms

cb_scout5.png

cb_scout5.png

51 ms

tmapctrl4.png

tmapctrl4.png

32 ms

imgs8.png

imgs8.png

50 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

57 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

71 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

54 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

58 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

59 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

59 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

34 ms

jot

jot

86 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

80 ms

Accessibility Review

wouldisurviveanuke.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wouldisurviveanuke.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wouldisurviveanuke.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wouldisurviveanuke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wouldisurviveanuke.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wouldisurviveanuke.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Would I Survive A Nuke. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: