2.7 sec in total
174 ms
2.2 sec
351 ms
Click here to check amazing Wrap content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wrap.me
Create personalised photo wrapping paper using all your favourite photos. Choose from a sheet or a roll with prices starting from £9.99 including free UK delivery.
Visit wrap.meWe analyzed Wrap.me page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wrap.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value14,590 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
174 ms
437 ms
54 ms
66 ms
343 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Wrap.me, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Wrap.me.
Page size can be reduced by 508.4 kB (23%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Wrap.me main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wrap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 467.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 467.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (46%)
39
21
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wrap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wrap.me
174 ms
wrap.me
437 ms
css
54 ms
css
66 ms
application.css
343 ms
vendor.js
633 ms
application.js
289 ms
home.js
285 ms
wrapme.png
84 ms
1038_thumb.jpg
251 ms
901_thumb.jpg
330 ms
898_thumb.jpg
249 ms
773_thumb.jpg
416 ms
767_thumb.jpg
418 ms
766_thumb.jpg
496 ms
756_thumb.jpg
496 ms
745_thumb.jpg
413 ms
728_thumb.jpg
495 ms
704_thumb.jpg
571 ms
close-btn.jpg
498 ms
close-btn.png
499 ms
gtm.js
103 ms
personalised-wrapping-paper-8.jpg
820 ms
wrapme-bg.jpg
1148 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
48 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
641 ms
di.js
414 ms
fbds.js
20 ms
96 ms
2168480457.js
355 ms
common.js
268 ms
all.js
6 ms
48 ms
xd_arbiter.php
79 ms
dc.js
83 ms
conversion_async.js
71 ms
oct.js
51 ms
tag4arm.js
515 ms
3338.js
119 ms
adsct
109 ms
adsct
115 ms
47 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
ga-audiences
44 ms
46 ms
wrap.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wrap.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wrap.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrap.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrap.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wrap.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wrap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: