1.9 sec in total
143 ms
1.6 sec
154 ms
Click here to check amazing Writers content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writers.net
Writers, Editors, Agents, Publishers-Writing Craft-Writing Craft Threads-Writing Critique-Brainstorming-Other Ways Into Print-Resources-Publishing & Editing Forum
Visit writers.netWe analyzed Writers.net page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
writers.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value3,820 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
143 ms
153 ms
130 ms
20 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Writers.net, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Everestads.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) belongs to the original domain Writers.net.
Page size can be reduced by 145.5 kB (41%)
354.3 kB
208.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Writers.net main page is 354.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 281.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 131.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.7 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writers.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (54%)
39
18
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
writers.net
143 ms
www.writers.net
153 ms
stylesheet_writers_sec.css
130 ms
urchin.js
20 ms
9ed0297c-0c95-47c9-b0d0-224e4a19af25.js
202 ms
ga.js
20 ms
gpt.js
19 ms
topnav_bg.gif
130 ms
1x1clear.gif
132 ms
writersnet_logo.gif
138 ms
button_search.gif
143 ms
tab_bg.gif
144 ms
tab_home.gif
171 ms
tab_writers.gif
259 ms
tab_agents.gif
274 ms
tab_editors.gif
284 ms
tab_publishers.gif
288 ms
tab_resources.gif
289 ms
tab_discussion.gif
288 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
19 ms
__utm.gif
43 ms
ads
80 ms
container.html
26 ms
brownbg.gif
322 ms
jstat.php
883 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
adsbygoogle.js
19 ms
osd.js
26 ms
ca-pub-4772942728854524.js
32 ms
zrt_lookup.html
40 ms
show_ads_impl.js
43 ms
ads
201 ms
osd.js
12 ms
ads
212 ms
ads
225 ms
4076
61 ms
4076
32 ms
2a022c026db1949b3e626eab67d0fe54_6.html
41 ms
2a022c026db1949b3e626eab67d0fe54_6.html
29 ms
428026abe34ba54ef48cc94a4b022ed2_6.html
292 ms
st.v2.js
25 ms
gr
25 ms
31c87031e32be561c7dcb55f9fbde956.png
11 ms
pixel_details.html
3 ms
611de613f12e82aec149ab8ac284f1b3.png
5 ms
writers.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
writers.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
writers.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writers.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Writers.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
writers.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: