2.6 sec in total
104 ms
2.3 sec
246 ms
Click here to check amazing Writingbydavid content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writingbydavid.com
This domain used to be connected to a Wix website. Learn how to reconnect it, or create your own website.
Visit writingbydavid.comWe analyzed Writingbydavid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
writingbydavid.com performance score
104 ms
106 ms
90 ms
50 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Writingbydavid.com, 49% (34 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (77%)
2.9 MB
676.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Writingbydavid.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writingbydavid images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingbydavid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (81%)
62
12
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingbydavid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writingbydavid.com
104 ms
www.writingbydavid.com
106 ms
bt
90 ms
require.min.js
50 ms
main-r.min.js
54 ms
viewer.css
70 ms
dynamicmodel
26 ms
e6f3f4_b75e1de76fd60451998ef4c6aa3ac561_198.json.z
623 ms
e6f3f4_680a76b7eac268ec5a2c3b1fe047cd97_191.json.z
482 ms
ugc-viewer
42 ms
bt
148 ms
skins.min.js
151 ms
components.min.js
41 ms
utils.min.js
78 ms
core.min.js
151 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
141 ms
lodash.min.js
78 ms
TweenMax.min.js
139 ms
layout.min.js
138 ms
tpa.min.js
141 ms
fonts.min.js
460 ms
animations.min.js
138 ms
swfobject.min.js
138 ms
mousetrap.min.js
138 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
138 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
139 ms
react-dom.min.js
139 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
141 ms
widgets.min.js
141 ms
experiment.js
141 ms
render.min.js
142 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
146 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
454 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
143 ms
zepto.min.js
141 ms
color.min.js
139 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
79 ms
bt
94 ms
dc.js
135 ms
bt
522 ms
wf_label_static.png
202 ms
css
201 ms
latin.css
191 ms
twitter.html
189 ms
plusone.js
148 ms
bt
157 ms
bt
156 ms
bt
157 ms
BG91x1.jpg
153 ms
like.php
324 ms
tweet_button.html
147 ms
__utm.gif
93 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
213 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
211 ms
fastbutton
269 ms
4cefdf47-0136-4169-9933-3225dbbec9d9.woff
122 ms
OYDuxipdfiwRmdIcPa4aKfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
123 ms
12HLnd4ZMzxtAvsUV8JcowLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
184 ms
jot
263 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
350 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
385 ms
ugc-viewer
117 ms
postmessageRelay
82 ms
rs=AGLTcCMmxxv5a__MjyaVcD74l1XyH_kiOQ
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
24 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
22 ms
pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
43 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
34 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
36 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
writingbydavid.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingbydavid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Writingbydavid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writingbydavid.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: