4 sec in total
1.6 sec
2.1 sec
264 ms
Welcome to wrl.org homepage info - get ready to check Wrl best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wrl.org
Visit wrl.orgWe analyzed Wrl.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wrl.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
1623 ms
18 ms
50 ms
87 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Wrl.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Wrl.org.
Page size can be reduced by 347.5 kB (21%)
1.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Wrl.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wrl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 77.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 77.7 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrl.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (5%)
55
52
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wrl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wrl.org
1623 ms
a51a438ffbb24af7b0e8af8ae5d8fda5.css
18 ms
css_c1cbb0bc41d487394f301070874f3739.css
50 ms
js_3fb9427e3e58e3f108f9a18fe52b1985.js
87 ms
analytics.js
113 ms
page.js
95 ms
wrlbackground.png
52 ms
bodyedge.png
53 ms
aSmall.gif
54 ms
aBig.gif
55 ms
wrlbanner3.jpg
69 ms
secondarynavbg.png
55 ms
Pickett's%20for%20Website.png
101 ms
Happy-Birthday-Dr-Seuss-from-kids-apps-mobi.jpg
68 ms
tax_aide_paperwork.jpg
58 ms
coins_invest_money.jpg
58 ms
genealogy.jpg
68 ms
Pickett's%20for%20Website.png
82 ms
Happy-Birthday-Dr-Seuss-from-kids-apps-mobi.jpg
69 ms
tax_aide_paperwork.jpg
71 ms
coins_invest_money.jpg
79 ms
genealogy.jpg
78 ms
hlicon.png
82 ms
arrow.png
99 ms
emailicon.png
99 ms
imicon.png
99 ms
phoneicon.png
115 ms
share_save_171_16.png
107 ms
twitter.png
114 ms
wordpress-blue.png
115 ms
facebook.png
117 ms
youtube.png
118 ms
blockbg.png
124 ms
calicon.png
135 ms
mailicon.png
132 ms
footericonsbackbg.png
136 ms
footericonsbg.png
139 ms
librarycardicon.png
142 ms
askusicon.png
160 ms
sitemapicon.png
160 ms
jamescountymapicon.png
166 ms
JCCL_exterior_93high.jpg
166 ms
collect
36 ms
sm13.html
40 ms
JCCL%20YS%20area.JPG
162 ms
JCCL_kitzinger_93high.jpg
125 ms
wrlmapicon.png
122 ms
WL%20Exterior.JPG
161 ms
WL%20Computers.JPG
180 ms
WL%20Gallery.JPG
170 ms
WL%20YS%20Desk.JPG
185 ms
WL%20Ref%20Desk.JPG
175 ms
previous.png
162 ms
pause.png
164 ms
next.png
176 ms
ga.js
71 ms
wrl.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
wrl.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wrl.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrl.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrl.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wrl.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wrl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: