3.1 sec in total
540 ms
2.1 sec
402 ms
Click here to check amazing WSST Wildapricot content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wsst.wildapricot.org
Visit wsst.wildapricot.orgWe analyzed Wsst.wildapricot.org page load time and found that the first response time was 540 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wsst.wildapricot.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
39/100
10%
540 ms
111 ms
116 ms
101 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Wsst.wildapricot.org, 44% (16 requests) were made to F.wildapricot.org and 6% (2 requests) were made to Feed.informer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Wsst.wildapricot.org.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (68%)
3.0 MB
940.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Wsst.wildapricot.org main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WSST Wildapricot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 828.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wsst.wildapricot.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 828.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)
29
18
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WSST Wildapricot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wsst.wildapricot.org
540 ms
newgadgets.css
111 ms
print.css
116 ms
shared.css
101 ms
theme.less
121 ms
user.css
165 ms
shared-ui-compiled.css
69 ms
bonapagetop-compiled.js
62 ms
shared-ui-compiled.js
103 ms
General.js
80 ms
combined.js
140 ms
2CNGNXEQOH.js
424 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
144 ms
wsst%20final%20png%20transparant%20high%20res.png
718 ms
headerpics_sm.jpg
175 ms
10803.png
186 ms
wsst%20logo.jpg
185 ms
flask-gif-join.png
512 ms
map_conferences.jpg
490 ms
more_small.png
505 ms
map_events.jpg
635 ms
map_wsela.jpg
619 ms
ecosystem-neurons-green.jpg
836 ms
Kevin_got_science_web.jpg
828 ms
neurons-green.jpg
1280 ms
icon_set.png
31 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
28 ms
opensans-light-webfont.woff
30 ms
opensans-semibold-webfont.woff
30 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
log.php
136 ms
opensans-italic-webfont.woff
56 ms
ga.js
59 ms
async-load-progress-01.gif
517 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
wsst.wildapricot.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
wsst.wildapricot.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wsst.wildapricot.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wsst.wildapricot.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wsst.wildapricot.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wsst.wildapricot.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WSST Wildapricot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: