3.3 sec in total
128 ms
2.5 sec
662 ms
Click here to check amazing XNet content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xnet.com
Chicago area data center specializing in high-performance cloud services, colocation services, website and application hosting, and dedicated connectivity.
Visit xnet.comWe analyzed Xnet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xnet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.248
50/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
128 ms
196 ms
70 ms
72 ms
1092 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Xnet.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Xnet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 587.6 kB (26%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Xnet.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XNet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 473.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xnet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 473.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (71%)
51
15
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XNet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xnet.com
128 ms
www.xnet.com
196 ms
normalize.css
70 ms
ie8.css
72 ms
1092 ms
css
25 ms
232 ms
icondemo.js
47 ms
excanvas.js
107 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
83 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
80 ms
jquerytransit.js
84 ms
css
14 ms
291 ms
css
15 ms
css
22 ms
css
24 ms
css
25 ms
fonts.css
43 ms
font-awesome.css
54 ms
icomoon-fonts.css
46 ms
jupiter-icons.css
56 ms
theme-styles.css
136 ms
responsive-theme.css
86 ms
contact-us.png
75 ms
about-bg.png
74 ms
blog.png
74 ms
cutomer-support.png
74 ms
data-center.png
71 ms
why-xnet.png
74 ms
service.png
97 ms
our-customer.png
99 ms
resources.png
98 ms
xnet-logo2.png
99 ms
red-xnet1.jpg
99 ms
withxnet1.jpg
124 ms
high-performance.png
124 ms
intense-customisation.png
124 ms
high-touch.png
124 ms
dont-hiren.png
124 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
37 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
37 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
36 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
146 ms
text-big-bg11.jpg
769 ms
text-big-bg2new.jpg
360 ms
txt-bg-new-nnn.jpg
395 ms
sep-bg.png
91 ms
call-ico.png
90 ms
email-us.png
160 ms
business-hours.png
161 ms
ga.js
12 ms
slddbg62.jpg
186 ms
E44LYN4bXPiBT-TMwacNsvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
58 ms
2hig-tnMw8lXZsjwuh-9ow.ttf
58 ms
evC1haE-MsorTl_A7_uSGaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
58 ms
__utm.gif
44 ms
skin.css
43 ms
style.css
41 ms
xnet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xnet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xnet.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xnet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xnet.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
xnet.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XNet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: