Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

builder.yaml.de

YAML Builder | A tool for visual development of YAML based CSS layouts

Page Load Speed

16 sec in total

First Response

781 ms

Resources Loaded

11.3 sec

Page Rendered

3.9 sec

builder.yaml.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to builder.yaml.de homepage info - get ready to check Builder YAML best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about builder.yaml.de

A tool for visual layout development of YAML based CSS layouts

Visit builder.yaml.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Builder.yaml.de page load time and found that the first response time was 781 ms and then it took 15.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

builder.yaml.de performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

builder.yaml.de

781 ms

slim_base.css

269 ms

nav_shinybuttons.css

269 ms

nav_slidingdoor.css

302 ms

basemod.css

303 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Builder.yaml.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Builder.yaml.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.6 kB (37%)

Content Size

77.9 kB

After Optimization

49.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Builder.yaml.de main page is 77.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 31.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 31.9 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 26.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Builder YAML images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (80%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Builder YAML. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

builder.yaml.de accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

builder.yaml.de best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

builder.yaml.de SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Builder.yaml.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Builder.yaml.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Builder YAML. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: