7.7 sec in total
1.9 sec
5.3 sec
390 ms
Visit 100miles.in now to see the best up-to-date 100 Miles content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 100miles.in
you can hear the whistle blow ...
Visit 100miles.inWe analyzed 100miles.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
100miles.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value33.7 s
0/100
25%
Value39.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,710 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value36.1 s
0/100
10%
1926 ms
145 ms
143 ms
36 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original 100miles.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Exchangeratewidget.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain 100miles.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (32%)
4.2 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of 100miles.in main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 100 Miles images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 569.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 515.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 100miles.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 515.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (67%)
97
32
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 100 Miles. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
100miles.in
1926 ms
960.css
145 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.min.js
143 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
style.css
168 ms
event.css
164 ms
dashicons.min.css
317 ms
thickbox.css
241 ms
usp-classic.css
244 ms
output.css
232 ms
jquery-ui-1.7.3.custom.css
233 ms
minimalist.css
14 ms
gsc.css
236 ms
styles.css
317 ms
mappress.css
326 ms
autocomplete.css
329 ms
style.css
332 ms
style.css
305 ms
daves-wordpress-live-search.js
380 ms
excanvas.js
390 ms
spinners.js
391 ms
usp.js
394 ms
pmxi.js
408 ms
require.js
475 ms
gsc.js
457 ms
jsapi
164 ms
install_swiftype.min.js
529 ms
common.css
470 ms
style.css
472 ms
sf.js
484 ms
spin.min.js
529 ms
plugins.js
669 ms
prime-plugin-base.js
548 ms
prime-plugins.js
613 ms
script.js
568 ms
js
43 ms
prettyphoto.css
644 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
627 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
687 ms
responsive.css
635 ms
minimalist.css
24 ms
converter.php
63 ms
converter.php
60 ms
addthis_widget.js
11 ms
fonts.css
665 ms
print.css
593 ms
animate.css
561 ms
thickbox.js
576 ms
style.css
590 ms
core.min.js
561 ms
widget.min.js
561 ms
mouse.min.js
560 ms
resizable.min.js
584 ms
draggable.min.js
583 ms
button.min.js
519 ms
position.min.js
550 ms
dialog.min.js
550 ms
jquery.form.min.js
551 ms
scripts.js
569 ms
easy-table.css
579 ms
install_te.js
525 ms
main.js
76 ms
fabric_plaid.png
75 ms
logo-hr.png
115 ms
10.jpg
362 ms
2.jpg
260 ms
3.jpg
358 ms
4.jpg
362 ms
dooars-photo-copy.jpg
609 ms
7.jpg
386 ms
8.jpg
422 ms
9.jpg
531 ms
1.jpg
576 ms
xyz-382x346.jpg
502 ms
san1-382x346.jpg
536 ms
trek-382x346.jpg
566 ms
furley_bg.png
2013 ms
1.jpg
697 ms
2.jpg
819 ms
3.jpg
691 ms
4.jpg
693 ms
5.jpg
656 ms
6.jpg
723 ms
7.jpg
844 ms
8.jpg
843 ms
sf_search.png
786 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
773 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
862 ms
entypo-webfont.woff
846 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
26 ms
flag.png
24 ms
te.js
183 ms
all.js
76 ms
300lo.json
60 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
52 ms
127 ms
xd_arbiter.php
31 ms
xd_arbiter.php
42 ms
widgets.js
25 ms
in.js
25 ms
plusone.js
57 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
49 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
100miles.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
100miles.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
100miles.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 100miles.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 100miles.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
100miles.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 100 Miles. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: