16.7 sec in total
4.2 sec
9.1 sec
3.4 sec
Welcome to 101alternatives.com homepage info - get ready to check 101 Alternatives best content right away, or after learning these important things about 101alternatives.com
101ALTERNATIVES.COM This domain name is for sale. Owning a suitable domain name will help you achieve greater success in your career. For any business consultation about 101ALTERNATIVES.COM, please co...
Visit 101alternatives.comWe analyzed 101alternatives.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.2 sec and then it took 12.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
101alternatives.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value19.9 s
0/100
10%
Value18,010 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value32.8 s
0/100
10%
4172 ms
284 ms
519 ms
715 ms
748 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original 101alternatives.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain 101alternatives.com.
Page size can be reduced by 95.8 kB (11%)
837.5 kB
741.6 kB
In fact, the total size of 101alternatives.com main page is 837.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 467.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 194 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 101 Alternatives images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 301 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 674 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 101alternatives.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (86%)
64
9
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 101 Alternatives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
101alternatives.com
4172 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
284 ms
style.min.css
519 ms
theme.min.css
715 ms
all.min.css
748 ms
bbpress.min.css
769 ms
style-frontend-pro.1.20.2.css
781 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
777 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
764 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
950 ms
slick.min.css
993 ms
style.min.css
1017 ms
bbpress.min.css
995 ms
style.css
1014 ms
css
223 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1107 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
1174 ms
frontend.min.css
1246 ms
post-1426.css
1344 ms
post-355.css
1290 ms
widgets.css
1261 ms
css
229 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1354 ms
solid.min.css
1392 ms
regular.min.css
1481 ms
brands.min.css
1470 ms
jquery.js
1502 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1500 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1655 ms
adsbygoogle.js
283 ms
badge.js
246 ms
snippet.js
257 ms
animations.min.css
1753 ms
front-end-free.1.20.2.js
2106 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
2126 ms
lightbox.min.js
2127 ms
main.min.js
2115 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
2115 ms
complianz.min.js
2121 ms
migrate.min.js
2110 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2111 ms
js
208 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2101 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1931 ms
waypoints.min.js
1681 ms
position.min.js
1488 ms
swiper.min.js
1479 ms
share-link.min.js
1456 ms
dialog.min.js
1899 ms
frontend.min.js
1838 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1837 ms
underscore.min.js
1750 ms
wp-util.min.js
1728 ms
frontend.min.js
1721 ms
main.jpg
2198 ms
help.jpg
2003 ms
8.jpg
1684 ms
9.jpg
2464 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
498 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rm.ttf
673 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf
673 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rm.ttf
672 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf
758 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf
672 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
758 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rm.ttf
759 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rm.ttf
759 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1266 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1235 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1264 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1262 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1022 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1021 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
1356 ms
show_ads_impl.js
673 ms
zrt_lookup.html
835 ms
3cd3d317-f210-45f6-b3f6-77e0afb20198
776 ms
cropped-101-Alternatives-Logos-01-2.png
929 ms
cookie.js
171 ms
integrator.js
148 ms
ads
104 ms
web-widget-framework-8bd776911afeefa93f7a.js
26 ms
101alternatives.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
101alternatives.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
101alternatives.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 101alternatives.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that 101alternatives.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
101alternatives.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 101 Alternatives. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: