4.3 sec in total
380 ms
2.9 sec
985 ms
Click here to check amazing 123Compare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 123compare.me
Take advantage of years of knowledge combined with our set of direct sales booster tools, from the price comparison tool to our business intelligence.
Visit 123compare.meWe analyzed 123compare.me page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
123compare.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value4,720 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.309
38/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
380 ms
64 ms
129 ms
171 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 123compare.me, 76% (73 requests) were made to 123compareme.net and 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source 123compareme.net.
Page size can be reduced by 393.4 kB (33%)
1.2 MB
803.3 kB
In fact, the total size of 123compare.me main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 527.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 378.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 378.2 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 123Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 123compare.me has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (91%)
76
7
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 123Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
123compare.me
380 ms
64 ms
style.min.css
129 ms
styles.css
171 ms
styles.css
159 ms
style.css
70 ms
style.min.css
222 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
73 ms
grid-system.css
199 ms
style.css
227 ms
header-layout-centered-menu.css
237 ms
element-testimonial.css
274 ms
element-highlighted-text.css
346 ms
element-fancy-unordered-list.css
246 ms
element-milestone.css
360 ms
owl-carousel.css
336 ms
element-recent-posts.css
350 ms
cf7.css
361 ms
css
73 ms
responsive.css
402 ms
flickity.css
451 ms
select2.css
453 ms
skin-material.css
659 ms
pum-site-styles.css
540 ms
js_composer.min.css
514 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
440 ms
css
66 ms
language-cookie.js
539 ms
jquery.min.js
714 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
555 ms
js
100 ms
email-decode.min.js
502 ms
style-non-critical.css
611 ms
font-awesome.min.css
660 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
651 ms
core.css
673 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
854 ms
slide-out-right-hover.css
852 ms
hooks.min.js
856 ms
i18n.min.js
852 ms
api.js
93 ms
index.js
853 ms
index.js
815 ms
salient-social.js
962 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
906 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
879 ms
priority.js
866 ms
transit.min.js
839 ms
waypoints.js
818 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
804 ms
hoverintent.min.js
803 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1078 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1059 ms
touchswipe.min.js
996 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
988 ms
anime.min.js
979 ms
nectar-text-inline-images.js
972 ms
flickity.js
1290 ms
stickkit.js
1072 ms
superfish.js
953 ms
init.js
1037 ms
select2.min.js
1023 ms
core.min.js
1055 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
1009 ms
css
17 ms
googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js
957 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1028 ms
index.js
1323 ms
wp-consent-api.min.js
988 ms
complianz.min.js
1021 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1019 ms
gtm.js
126 ms
123COMPARE.ME-2.png
1460 ms
frank-mckenna-wrD_WHXHwHs-unsplash-600x403.avif
1029 ms
francesca-saraco-_dS27XGgRyQ-unsplash-600x403.avif
1270 ms
sean-oulashin-KMn4VEeEPR8-unsplash-600x403.jpg
978 ms
john-schnobrich-FlPc9_VocJ4-unsplash-1-600x403.jpg
1209 ms
linkedin-2.png
1053 ms
facebook-2.png
1091 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
294 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
295 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
332 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
332 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_m079TR_Q.ttf
334 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9TR_Q.ttf
334 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9TR_Q.ttf
332 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
334 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
334 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
335 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
335 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
337 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
335 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
337 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
336 ms
icomoon.woff
959 ms
recaptcha__en.js
33 ms
123compare.me accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
123compare.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
123compare.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 123compare.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 123compare.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
123compare.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 123Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: