Tools & Wizards About Us
160by2.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 47

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

160by2.com

Welcome to QuizUps

Page Load Speed

23.2 sec in total

First Response

651 ms

Resources Loaded

17.1 sec

Page Rendered

5.4 sec

160by2.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 160by2.com homepage info - get ready to check 160 By 2 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 160by2.com

Generated by create next app

Visit 160by2.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 160by2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 651 ms and then it took 22.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

160by2.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.160by2.com

651 ms

adRecover.js

591 ms

160by2_styles.css

1327 ms

jquery.js

1477 ms

gpt.js

653 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original 160by2.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.adhigh.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.adhigh.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 603.9 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

574.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 160by2.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 824.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 274.9 kB
  • After minification 260.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 160 By 2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 524.6 kB

  • Original 824.6 kB
  • After minification 821.3 kB
  • After compression 300.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 524.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 48.0 kB

  • Original 56.2 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 160by2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (70%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 160 By 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.160by2.com

www.160by2.com

651 ms

adRecover.js

adRecover.js

591 ms

160by2_styles.css

160by2_styles.css

1327 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1477 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

653 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

79 ms

block.jpg

block.jpg

241 ms

feedback

feedback

58 ms

SessionCheck

SessionCheck

687 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

487 ms

sp_out.png

sp_out.png

589 ms

pubads_impl_147.js

pubads_impl_147.js

578 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

879 ms

ads

ads

258 ms

container.html

container.html

33 ms

fo_v01_index.js

fo_v01_index.js

519 ms

container.html

container.html

413 ms

osd.js

osd.js

394 ms

fm_v01_index.js

fm_v01_index.js

368 ms

m.js

m.js

3882 ms

p.js

p.js

3859 ms

m_window_focus_non_hydra.js

m_window_focus_non_hydra.js

2998 ms

osd_listener.js

osd_listener.js

3858 ms

ext.js

ext.js

3857 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

492 ms

collect

collect

1483 ms

v.js

v.js

48 ms

ua-parser.min.js

ua-parser.min.js

876 ms

imp.js

imp.js

381 ms

ac

ac

797 ms

sas-browser.js

sas-browser.js

192 ms

sas-dom.js

sas-dom.js

153 ms

sas-banner-2.4.js

sas-banner-2.4.js

32 ms

aniview.js

aniview.js

630 ms

track

track

617 ms

Accessibility Review

160by2.com accessibility score

47

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

160by2.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

160by2.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 160by2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 160by2.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

160by2.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 160 By 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: