10.7 sec in total
4.6 sec
5.8 sec
241 ms
Welcome to 168film.com homepage info - get ready to check 168 Film best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about 168film.com
Visit 168film.comWe analyzed 168film.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize 168film.com rating and web reputation
168film.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
91/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
4649 ms
572 ms
43 ms
81 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original 168film.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain 168film.com.
Page size can be reduced by 756.1 kB (71%)
1.1 MB
311.7 kB
In fact, the total size of 168film.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 767.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 168 Film needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 570.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 570.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 168film.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (47%)
49
26
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 168 Film. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
168film.com
4649 ms
168film.com
572 ms
default.css
43 ms
views.css
81 ms
module.css
99 ms
SearchSkinObjectPreview.css
108 ms
module.css
122 ms
skin.css
146 ms
container.css
115 ms
portal.css
111 ms
slider.css
141 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
38 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
43 ms
WebResource.axd
136 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
193 ms
dnn.js
193 ms
dnn.modalpopup.js
189 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
191 ms
dnn.jquery.js
247 ms
dnn.servicesframework.js
191 ms
dnncore.js
192 ms
SearchSkinObjectPreview.js
203 ms
hcc.core.js
228 ms
hcc.views.js
230 ms
slider.js
230 ms
168.js
231 ms
initWidgets.js
232 ms
ga.js
29 ms
168logo.png
102 ms
19-8-24.jpg
104 ms
WorkBkgnd.png
363 ms
WORK150.png
102 ms
warmup.JPG
178 ms
FP2016Ssm.png
147 ms
FP_ico.gif
147 ms
WP_ico.gif
148 ms
LinkClick.aspx
257 ms
FF_ico.gif
148 ms
MH_ico.gif
149 ms
LH_ico.gif
151 ms
AdventMediaInc.png
167 ms
frontgate_transp150.png
170 ms
roush-media_logo.png
188 ms
ParablesLogo2015.png
216 ms
UpliftLogo.png
202 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
menuIcon.png
143 ms
searchIcon.png
150 ms
cartIcon.png
140 ms
filmBg.jpg
145 ms
ftrIcons.png
160 ms
socialIcons.png
164 ms
peric-webfont.woff
181 ms
DotNetNukeAjaxShared.js
141 ms
widgets.js
33 ms
168film.com accessibility score
168film.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 168film.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 168film.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
168film.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 168 Film. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: