Tools & Wizards About Us
1928weddingplanners.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

1928weddingplanners.com

Southwest Michigan Wedding Planners |1928 Planning Co.

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

286 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

1928weddingplanners.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 1928 Wedding Planners content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 1928weddingplanners.com

Full-service Southwest Michigan wedding planners, helping couples with wedding planning for their amazing destination weddings and Michigan beach weddings.

Visit 1928weddingplanners.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 1928weddingplanners.com page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1928weddingplanners.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.473

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1928weddingplanners.com

286 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

27 ms

style.min.css

41 ms

settings.css

62 ms

style.css

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original 1928weddingplanners.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (939 ms) belongs to the original domain 1928weddingplanners.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 1928weddingplanners.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 720.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

  • Original 105.5 kB
  • After minification 101.4 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 28.7 kB

  • Original 720.2 kB
  • After minification 691.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1928 Wedding Planners images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 482.4 kB
  • After minification 482.4 kB
  • After compression 473.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 177.0 kB
  • After minification 176.7 kB
  • After compression 171.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1928weddingplanners.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (75%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1928 Wedding Planners. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

1928weddingplanners.com

1928weddingplanners.com

286 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

27 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

41 ms

settings.css

settings.css

62 ms

style.css

style.css

68 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

53 ms

datatables.min.css

datatables.min.css

65 ms

style.css

style.css

68 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

65 ms

modules.min.css

modules.min.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

89 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

95 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

90 ms

style.css

style.css

92 ms

style.css

style.css

95 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

98 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

186 ms

style_dynamic.css

style_dynamic.css

192 ms

modules-responsive.min.css

modules-responsive.min.css

194 ms

blog-responsive.min.css

blog-responsive.min.css

191 ms

style_dynamic_responsive.css

style_dynamic_responsive.css

193 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

225 ms

css

css

34 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

283 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

335 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

296 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

301 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

295 ms

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

334 ms

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

381 ms

public.js

public.js

382 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

386 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

384 ms

photon.min.js

photon.min.js

811 ms

2646291.js

2646291.js

94 ms

wpc-js.js

wpc-js.js

814 ms

jquery.dataTables.js

jquery.dataTables.js

84 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

32 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

876 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

877 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

882 ms

js

js

94 ms

e-202436.js

e-202436.js

31 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

895 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

893 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

939 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

838 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

834 ms

third-party.min.js

third-party.min.js

889 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

861 ms

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

862 ms

smoothPageScroll.js

smoothPageScroll.js

849 ms

modules.min.js

modules.min.js

869 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

877 ms

like.min.js

like.min.js

877 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

876 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

96 ms

2016-logo-.png

2016-logo-.png

280 ms

jacinta-review-01-01.png

jacinta-review-01-01.png

529 ms

Untitled3-444x444.png

Untitled3-444x444.png

831 ms

medsker-review-01.png

medsker-review-01.png

521 ms

april-testimonial.png

april-testimonial.png

516 ms

laporte-testimonial-01.png

laporte-testimonial-01.png

543 ms

2016-logo-01-e1484942939781.png

2016-logo-01-e1484942939781.png

696 ms

AP_1178-e1553863565450.jpg

AP_1178-e1553863565450.jpg

844 ms

Untitled4-388x388.png

Untitled4-388x388.png

788 ms

brides-padge.jpg

brides-padge.jpg

475 ms

midwestbridebadge.png

midwestbridebadge.png

505 ms

theknot.jpg

theknot.jpg

270 ms

TWM-Badge_Square.png

TWM-Badge_Square.png

476 ms

Untitled-1-391x391.png

Untitled-1-391x391.png

696 ms

junebug-wedding.png

junebug-wedding.png

288 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

163 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtXK-F2qO0g.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtXK-F2qO0g.woff

439 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPc.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPc.woff

327 ms

3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIfto9tWZeWGMKHD0VQtL.woff

3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIfto9tWZeWGMKHD0VQtL.woff

199 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

882 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

857 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

17 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

131 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

js

js

64 ms

banner.js

banner.js

116 ms

2646291.js

2646291.js

292 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

106 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

262 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

17 ms

Accessibility Review

1928weddingplanners.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

1928weddingplanners.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

1928weddingplanners.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1928weddingplanners.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1928weddingplanners.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

1928weddingplanners.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1928 Wedding Planners. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: