6.8 sec in total
265 ms
2.9 sec
3.6 sec
Click here to check amazing 1960 Ng content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 1960ng.com
Shop more, spend less at 1960NG Online Marketplace
Visit 1960ng.comWe analyzed 1960ng.com page load time and found that the first response time was 265 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
1960ng.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value320 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.091
92/100
15%
Value6.3 s
60/100
10%
265 ms
1295 ms
35 ms
104 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original 1960ng.com, 40% (14 requests) were made to Ueeshop-static.ly200-cdn.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain 1960ng.com.
Page size can be reduced by 519.2 kB (62%)
843.9 kB
324.8 kB
In fact, the total size of 1960ng.com main page is 843.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 654.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 517.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 517.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1960 Ng images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 57 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1960ng.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (67%)
30
10
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1960 Ng. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1960ng.com
265 ms
1960ng.com
1295 ms
fbevents.js
35 ms
js
104 ms
js
83 ms
gtm.js
102 ms
global.css
322 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
324 ms
jquery.lazysizes.js
320 ms
global.min.js
317 ms
global.min.js
320 ms
iconfont.js
335 ms
main.js
338 ms
font.css
340 ms
font.css
339 ms
font.css
336 ms
font.css
334 ms
js
69 ms
client
126 ms
externalcall.js
55 ms
email-decode.min.js
81 ms
xfbml.customerchat.js
56 ms
analytics.js
1068 ms
analytics
438 ms
sdk.js
20 ms
no_img.svg
72 ms
message-us-blue.png
71 ms
font.woff
50 ms
sdk.js
13 ms
49 ms
font.woff
23 ms
icon_sale_bg.png
603 ms
icon_chat_menu.png
29 ms
analytics
274 ms
1960NGLogo.png
432 ms
1960ng.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
1960ng.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
1960ng.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1960ng.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1960ng.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
1960ng.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1960 Ng. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: