Tools & Wizards About Us
energostream.1gb.ua screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

energostream.1gb.ua

Отопление под ключ. Комплексные решения по отоплению. Днепропетровск. Ecoforce

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

958 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

energostream.1gb.ua screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Energostream 1 Gb content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about energostream.1gb.ua

Отопление дома под ключ. Скидки на комплексные решения. Бесплатные консультации. Выезд специалиста. Предоставляется проект.

Visit energostream.1gb.ua

Key Findings

We analyzed Energostream.1gb.ua page load time and found that the first response time was 958 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

energostream.1gb.ua performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.155

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

energostream.1gb.ua

958 ms

default.css

246 ms

widgetkit-5801120a.css

494 ms

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

497 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

248 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Energostream.1gb.ua, 2% (1 request) were made to Bs.yandex.ru and 2% (1 request) were made to Banners.copyscape.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (989 ms) belongs to the original domain Energostream.1gb.ua.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.6 MB (94%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

227.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Energostream.1gb.ua main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-99%

Potential reduce by 3.2 MB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 MB or 99% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 48.2 kB
  • After minification 35.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Energostream 1 Gb needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 302.6 kB

  • Original 450.3 kB
  • After minification 422.3 kB
  • After compression 147.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 302.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 124.9 kB

  • Original 151.0 kB
  • After minification 119.7 kB
  • After compression 26.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energostream.1gb.ua needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (73%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energostream 1 Gb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

energostream.1gb.ua

energostream.1gb.ua

958 ms

default.css

default.css

246 ms

widgetkit-5801120a.css

widgetkit-5801120a.css

494 ms

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

497 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

248 ms

jquery.media.js

jquery.media.js

370 ms

functions.js

functions.js

373 ms

validateForm.js

validateForm.js

369 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

620 ms

widgetkit-a31694d0.js

widgetkit-a31694d0.js

514 ms

base.css

base.css

514 ms

layout.css

layout.css

516 ms

menus.css

menus.css

617 ms

modules.css

modules.css

617 ms

tools.css

tools.css

618 ms

system.css

system.css

619 ms

extensions.css

extensions.css

628 ms

custom.css

custom.css

741 ms

animation.css

animation.css

741 ms

world.css

world.css

741 ms

arial.css

arial.css

743 ms

pt.css

pt.css

742 ms

trebuchet.css

trebuchet.css

745 ms

style.css

style.css

866 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

865 ms

print.css

print.css

864 ms

pt.css

pt.css

867 ms

warp.js

warp.js

867 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

868 ms

accordionmenu.js

accordionmenu.js

988 ms

dropdownmenu.js

dropdownmenu.js

988 ms

template.js

template.js

989 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

367 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

612 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

369 ms

base.css

base.css

489 ms

layout.css

layout.css

489 ms

menus.css

menus.css

489 ms

modules.css

modules.css

489 ms

tools.css

tools.css

491 ms

system.css

system.css

612 ms

system.css

system.css

613 ms

system-all.css

system-all.css

613 ms

print.css

print.css

375 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

377 ms

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

361 ms

cs-wh-88x31.gif

cs-wh-88x31.gif

132 ms

map.png

map.png

148 ms

menu_line_item.png

menu_line_item.png

147 ms

obratZ.gif

obratZ.gif

150 ms

telefoni.gif

telefoni.gif

148 ms

logo5.gif

logo5.gif

149 ms

image00.jpg

image00.jpg

149 ms

arrow_up.gif

arrow_up.gif

250 ms

thumb_paket1f1.jpg

thumb_paket1f1.jpg

249 ms

thumb_paket1f.jpg

thumb_paket1f.jpg

251 ms

menu_sidebar_parent_active.png

menu_sidebar_parent_active.png

251 ms

menu_sidebar_level2.png

menu_sidebar_level2.png

251 ms

menu_sidebar_parent.png

menu_sidebar_parent.png

251 ms

totop_scroller.png

totop_scroller.png

373 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

106 ms

PTN57F-webfont.woff

PTN57F-webfont.woff

348 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

271 ms

slideset.js

slideset.js

272 ms

map.js

map.js

270 ms

Accessibility Review

energostream.1gb.ua accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

energostream.1gb.ua best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

energostream.1gb.ua SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energostream.1gb.ua can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energostream.1gb.ua main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

energostream.1gb.ua

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Energostream 1 Gb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: