Tools & Wizards About Us
200forwindow.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

200forwindow.com

Chicagoland Windows & More Since 2001 | Tri-Star Siding & Windows

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

315 ms

200forwindow.com screenshot

About Website

Visit 200forwindow.com now to see the best up-to-date 200 Forwindow content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 200forwindow.com

Tri-Star is a new & replacement windows, doors, siding, and gutters contractor in the Chicagoland area. Contact us for a free, personalized estimate.

Visit 200forwindow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 200forwindow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

200forwindow.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

200forwindow.com

44 ms

tristarwindow.com

128 ms

style.min.css

49 ms

latest.css

56 ms

live-site-control.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 200forwindow.com, 94% (62 requests) were made to Tristarwindow.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Tristarwindow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 153.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 200forwindow.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 152.3 kB

  • Original 183.1 kB
  • After minification 180.5 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 152.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 200 Forwindow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 731 B

  • Original 938.6 kB
  • After minification 938.6 kB
  • After compression 937.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 128 B

  • Original 30.8 kB
  • After minification 30.8 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 200forwindow.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (90%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 200 Forwindow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

200forwindow.com

200forwindow.com

44 ms

tristarwindow.com

tristarwindow.com

128 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

49 ms

latest.css

latest.css

56 ms

live-site-control.css

live-site-control.css

58 ms

js

js

94 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

38 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

2312 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

63 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

65 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

64 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

70 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

71 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

70 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

87 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

108 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

109 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

110 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

109 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

112 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

126 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

116 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

110 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

117 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

139 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

134 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

141 ms

date.min.js

date.min.js

139 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

155 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

154 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

1499 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

171 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

169 ms

rich-text.min.js

rich-text.min.js

186 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

188 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

195 ms

blob.min.js

blob.min.js

186 ms

autop.min.js

autop.min.js

206 ms

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

208 ms

shortcode.min.js

shortcode.min.js

397 ms

blocks.min.js

blocks.min.js

187 ms

keyboard-shortcuts.min.js

keyboard-shortcuts.min.js

264 ms

commands.min.js

commands.min.js

172 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

244 ms

preferences-persistence.min.js

preferences-persistence.min.js

242 ms

preferences.min.js

preferences.min.js

243 ms

style-engine.min.js

style-engine.min.js

237 ms

token-list.min.js

token-list.min.js

1637 ms

wordcount.min.js

wordcount.min.js

238 ms

block-editor.min.js

block-editor.min.js

235 ms

core-data.min.js

core-data.min.js

212 ms

live-site-control.js

live-site-control.js

245 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

241 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

263 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

268 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

282 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

283 ms

common.js

common.js

504 ms

Tristar-1-Horiz-Small.png

Tristar-1-Horiz-Small.png

294 ms

Windows-01-scaled.jpg

Windows-01-scaled.jpg

305 ms

PlI5Fl60Nb5obNzNe2jslWxNvcc.woff

PlI5Fl60Nb5obNzNe2jslWxNvcc.woff

48 ms

PlI5Fl60Nb5obNzNe2jslWxNvcQ.ttf

PlI5Fl60Nb5obNzNe2jslWxNvcQ.ttf

79 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

1926 ms

Doors-01-scaled.jpg

Doors-01-scaled.jpg

1324 ms

Windows-02-scaled.jpg

Windows-02-scaled.jpg

23 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

34 ms

Accessibility Review

200forwindow.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

200forwindow.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

200forwindow.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 200forwindow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 200forwindow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

200forwindow.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 200 Forwindow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: